Re: RE: that was lame | <– Date –> <– Thread –> |
From: Jayne Kulikauskas (cml![]() |
|
Date: Wed, 30 Jan 2002 15:48:01 -0700 (MST) |
"Ruddick, T.R." <RUDDICK [at] edison.cc.oh.us> writes: > >Debbie asked me to write back privately, and > >I posted to the list. My apologies! =) > > > >-Maggi > > Private email responses might include more frank and open thoughts than > posting to the list, and I'm guessing that's why the request was made. > > But I see no reason to apologize...I found the question stimulating and I'd > like to see open discussion of it here. If anyone else is interested. [] I'm interested. Since Whole Village is still in its development phase, I'm also interested in ideas on how to indicate that a community will welcome GLBT members. Our brochures and website talk about valuing diversity. Is that clear enough? Jayne _______________________________________________ Cohousing-L mailing list Cohousing-L [at] cohousing.org Unsubscribe and other info: http://www.communityforum.net/mailman/listinfo/cohousing-l
-
RE: that was lame Ruddick, T.R., January 30 2002
- Re: RE: that was lame Jayne Kulikauskas, January 30 2002
- Re: RE: that was lame Maggi Rohde, January 30 2002
- Subject lines and signatures Elizabeth Stevenson, January 30 2002
Results generated by Tiger Technologies Web hosting using MHonArc.