RE: blocking consensus | <– Date –> <– Thread –> |
From: Rob Sandelin (floriferous![]() |
|
Date: Sun, 3 Feb 2002 22:44:10 -0700 (MST) |
In a healthy community process, we each speak our truths and we care enough to listen to others with compassion. If a decision is overly hurtful to an individual, as a group we care about that, and do our best to make it less so. And when this happens trust is built that my groupmates care about me and would not knowingly do something to hurt me. From this place of trust I can share my concerns freely. But this is sometimes an unrealized idealism. And sometimes people don't really care about each other, just getting what they want. And people can act in ways which inhibit the sharing of personal concerns and even participation at all. If telling your groupmates how much this decision is going to hurt you does not bring up changes and they move on past you regularly, then your relationship to the group is not well. It is easy to blame others for this, but it may be that you own part of the cause of this as well. Self examination and group examination of the relationship can help mend it. But be advised, this is painful work and requires a level of personal growth commitment which may be tremendous. Also, there are bottom line agendas which drive things sometimes. In development mode, the bottom line is getting it built, and frankly, most groups needlessly stumble into painful places trying to consensus on issues that should be punted to professionals. Also, once you move in, most decisions made can be changed later. One of the key elements most people miss about consensus is that it is based in humility. I can disagree, but I am not always right, in so by letting the group know my thoughts, and letting them move ahead, even when I disagree, there is learning. A year later, it could be that my disagreement issue is well understood now, and the decision is changed. Or maybe, just maybe, I was wrong, and what I thought or feared might happen did not. Most serious blocks I have encountered were based in fear, usually of an unknown or possible consequence. And of course, I have seen lots of blocks used for personal advantage, to thwart a group from going a particular way that an individual did not like. After ten years of living in cohousing I guess in general my expectations are that groups will make mistakes, and sometimes only by making the mistake can the next level of learning take place. I can give my perspective based on what I know, and if the groups moves to do something I disagree with, I pretty much just shrug it off and move into watchful evaluation to see what the next should be once we have some experience. Living in community is not for everybody, and so you need to recognize that maybe you can't really ever be happy giving up control over some things and that community is not the right place to be. The nice thing about most cohousing is that the money investment is usually recoverable, and the learning experience usually has some value. Rob Sandelin _______________________________________________ Cohousing-L mailing list Cohousing-L [at] cohousing.org Unsubscribe and other info: http://www.communityforum.net/mailman/listinfo/cohousing-l
- Re: Sociocracy (response to "blocking consensus" and long), (continued)
- Re: Sociocracy (response to "blocking consensus" and long) Sheila Braun, February 13 2002
- Re: Sociocracy (response to "blocking consensus" and long) Tree Bressen, February 14 2002
- Re: Sociocracy (response to "blocking consensus" and long) Sheila Braun, February 27 2002
- Re: Sociocracy (elections) Tree Bressen, March 6 2002
Results generated by Tiger Technologies Web hosting using MHonArc.