Consensus and the Concept of Blocking | <– Date –> <– Thread –> |
From: Sharon Villines (sharon![]() |
|
Date: Thu, 28 Mar 2002 15:09:01 -0700 (MST) |
> There is also a very important function of having a backup. It makes people > more cooperative. If I know that I can't stop the group just by blocking > consensus, and that they will outvote me at a future meeting, then even the > most uncooperative person is likely to make some moves towards compromise, > because they know they will simply get outvoted a couple meetings down the > road. It makes sense, if only to satisfy the bank, to have a back up voting procedure established to cover impossible situations that could occur. But in general I find the concept of "blocking" to be meaningless. Whether consensus is defined as either full agreement or the absence of objection, there is no consensus until there is full agreement or no objections. No one can block what doesn't exist. The lack of consensus means the group has not found a solution (or explained it adequately) for everyone to feel comfortable with it. To view someone who disagrees as uncooperative is to disparage the position of that person. Those who are agreeing are just as uncooperative from the objector's point of view. To hold that the one person is the uncooperative person, not the majority is an attitude that is not part of the _spirit_ of consensus. Once you start thinking this way, you are in the majority rules system. The other reason for having a back up voting and majority rules system in place is that consensus requires that the group have shared goals. There comes a time when the group does not have shared goals, the majority vote essentially splits the group or splits off a small minority. It would seem that sometimes this would be necessary and a mechanism in place to do it. After a majority vote in a cohousing community, I can't imagine continuing as before. It would be broken. Perhaps fixable, but definitely broken. Sharon -- Sharon Villines Takoma Village Cohousing, Washington DC http://www.takomavillage.org _______________________________________________ Cohousing-L mailing list Cohousing-L [at] cohousing.org Unsubscribe and other info: http://www.communityforum.net/mailman/listinfo/cohousing-l
-
CC&Rs in California Mccourt, Eileen, March 27 2002
-
RE: CC&Rs in California: decision making clauses Rob Sandelin, March 28 2002
- decision making clauses Rowenahc, March 28 2002
- Consensus and the Concept of Blocking Sharon Villines, March 28 2002
- RE: Consensus and the Concept of Blocking Rob Sandelin, March 28 2002
- Re: Consensus and the Concept of Blocking Martie Weatherly, March 28 2002
-
RE: CC&Rs in California: decision making clauses Rob Sandelin, March 28 2002
Results generated by Tiger Technologies Web hosting using MHonArc.