| Re: Criteria for setting meeting agendas | <– Date –> <– Thread –> |
|
From: Howard Landman (howard |
|
| Date: Mon, 29 Apr 2002 07:43:01 -0600 (MDT) | |
> We have a parking lot of issue and some of
> these issues have been in the parking lot for many months. Clearly, this
> is discouraging many people. These are issues that can wait. And they do.
> What is also frustrating to people is that some people wait and wait
> patiently for issues which are important to them to come to the general
> meetings. Then someone else proposes an issue which needs immediate
> attention. So then the parking lot issues have to wait even longer.
A fundamental theorem of Queuing Theory is that if items are added to
a queue on average faster than they are serviced, then the queue
will grow arbitrarily large with probability 1. It sounds to me like
you are not servicing issues quickly enough. I would recommend having
extra meetings to deal with them until the parking lot is empty.
Based on your having about a dozen items backed up in about 6 months,
it sounds like you need to increase your throughput by about 2 items
per month on average.
Howard A. Landman
River Rock Cohousing
Fort Collins, CO
_______________________________________________
Cohousing-L mailing list
Cohousing-L [at] cohousing.org Unsubscribe and other info:
http://www.communityforum.net/mailman/listinfo/cohousing-l
-
Criteria for setting meeting agendas Becky Schaller, April 28 2002
- Re: Criteria for setting meeting agendas Howard Landman, April 29 2002
- RE: Criteria for setting meeting agendas Rob Sandelin, April 29 2002
- Re: Criteria for setting meeting agendas Berrins, April 29 2002
Results generated by Tiger Technologies Web hosting using MHonArc.