Re: Criteria for setting meeting agendas | <– Date –> <– Thread –> |
From: Howard Landman (howard![]() |
|
Date: Mon, 29 Apr 2002 07:43:01 -0600 (MDT) |
> We have a parking lot of issue and some of > these issues have been in the parking lot for many months. Clearly, this > is discouraging many people. These are issues that can wait. And they do. > What is also frustrating to people is that some people wait and wait > patiently for issues which are important to them to come to the general > meetings. Then someone else proposes an issue which needs immediate > attention. So then the parking lot issues have to wait even longer. A fundamental theorem of Queuing Theory is that if items are added to a queue on average faster than they are serviced, then the queue will grow arbitrarily large with probability 1. It sounds to me like you are not servicing issues quickly enough. I would recommend having extra meetings to deal with them until the parking lot is empty. Based on your having about a dozen items backed up in about 6 months, it sounds like you need to increase your throughput by about 2 items per month on average. Howard A. Landman River Rock Cohousing Fort Collins, CO _______________________________________________ Cohousing-L mailing list Cohousing-L [at] cohousing.org Unsubscribe and other info: http://www.communityforum.net/mailman/listinfo/cohousing-l
-
Criteria for setting meeting agendas Becky Schaller, April 28 2002
- Re: Criteria for setting meeting agendas Howard Landman, April 29 2002
- RE: Criteria for setting meeting agendas Rob Sandelin, April 29 2002
- Re: Criteria for setting meeting agendas Berrins, April 29 2002
Results generated by Tiger Technologies Web hosting using MHonArc.