Re: Point Person for Maintenance | <– Date –> <– Thread –> |
From: Cheryl A. Charis-Graves (ccharis![]() |
|
Date: Sun, 26 May 2002 10:10:02 -0600 (MDT) |
On 5/24/02 10:24 AM, "pattymara [at] juno.com" <pattymara [at] juno.com> wrote: > OK, Matt, I'll bite. Please describe your point person structure for > community maintenance. I am not Matt, but I am a resident of Harmony Village along with Matt and am actually one of the key players in design of our new structure. Under our team structure, it seemed that the tasks that got done were the ones for which there was a person who "took the bull by the horns" (I am a Taurus) and provided leadership around organizing the information, the task, etc. Left to the team as a whole, many tasks languished for the perennial reasons: lack of time, lack of expertise, lack of interest. Also, our first attempt at a coordinating council seemed to also languish for lack of focus and lack of real authority to act. Too much lack goin' on and not enough focussed attention to those tasks which are ongoing and necessary but not so enjoyable. And we are already paying a fairly high rate in annual dues, so adding in the cost of a property manager seemed problematic at present. And overall planning and coordination was fairly loose. That works if things are still getting done, but as things went on, our budget was rising, our level of volunteer participation was dropping, and our sense of camaraderie was suffering. The plan mentioned by Patty Mara to "adopt-an-appliance" is definitely in the same vein. We created a list of tasks, split these tasks as best we could into "critical maintenance" and "important/desirable" (the issue of values was huge in response to the word "critical"), then clustered the tasks into "like groups." We have a five-member Coordinating Council with more authority than the previous Council (within defined parameters, of course) who are responsible for "domains" -- Buildings (which includes CH maintenance and management, along with exterior surfaces), Grounds (landscape stuff, snow removal, hardscape, etc.), Finances (HOA, long-term reserves, etc.), Social Capital (a term we adopted to mean "social wealth in the form of people meeting and interacting with others to generate healthy interdependence" -- which includes all our communication tasks as well as the social interaction tasks, including meal team coordination), and Hands-On Tasks (an attempt to put some zip into the concept of working together -- which includes the hot tub, workshop, and kids' room). Each of the point positions identifies a cluster of tasks for which the point person is responsible. The point person doesn't have to do the work of the tasks, but organizes the information and the materials needed to do the task, coordinates with the CC rep to get the task on the list for work days or work parties, and in general communicates with the CC rep about budget needs, etc. The Coordinating Council oversees the budget, and each CC rep keeps track of the budgeted money within their "domain." (I am in Early Childhood and we talk about developmental domains so the term seems natural.) So we have 5 CC reps, each with a designated "assistant," and a matrix of 22 point positions (one which is shared between two people) falling into the domains of responsibility for each of the CC reps. It looks fairly hierarchical, but it's still more like a wagon wheel with a hub at the center and spokes of responsibility radiating outward. We have a total of 39 adult residents, not including associate residents (renters). That means we have 33 adults with "designated duties" and about 6 floaters (persons with special circumstances) some of whom also have a single specific task they have agreed to take on. It took several months to discuss and design the new structure. I did a lot of the research, and relied on input from both the coho-l archives and persons on this list who responded to my person queries. Also, I took back to our community the ideas originated (articilated?) by Rob Sandelin, Tree Bressen, and others to adopt an attitude of "trying it out" and making needed adjustments along the way. I built in a "sunset clause" at one year out to insure that we would take a serious look at how the new structure is working. And so the grand experiment is underway! Long response to your request . . . Cheryl Charis-Graves Harmony Village, Golden CO Where we are grieving the loss of one of our elders, a man who marched in Selma with Martin Luther King Jr and advocated for the earth in unceasing manner _______________________________________________ Cohousing-L mailing list Cohousing-L [at] cohousing.org Unsubscribe and other info: http://www.communityforum.net/mailman/listinfo/cohousing-l
-
Point Person for Maintenance pattymara, May 25 2002
- Re: Point Person for Maintenance Cheryl A. Charis-Graves, May 26 2002
- RE: Point Person for Maintenance Robyn, May 27 2002
Results generated by Tiger Technologies Web hosting using MHonArc.