Re: Diversity in Cohousing | <– Date –> <– Thread –> |
From: Sharon Villines (sharon![]() |
|
Date: Sat, 13 Jul 2002 09:45:01 -0600 (MDT) |
on 7/13/2002 9:41 AM, Racheli Gai at jnpalme [at] attglobal.net wrote: > Regardless of the potential wonderful things the people described by Scott > and Sharon might have brought to cohousing, I seriously question people > who draw conclusions in such a hurry: I suspect that their willingness to > engage was shallow to begin with: > They could have stuck around for a while longer, while trying to > contribute their own point of view, and thereby possibly having an > influence on the direction the group might be heading. After all, the > "group" is an aggregate of individuals, and new people can change the > flavor of the stew. I can see how if some months went by, in which > their efforts to add different ingredients to the mix were consistently > ignored, or rejected, that leaving might have been a reasonable option. For people who have already had good experiences with groups and shared community activities, this is a reasonable assumption. But many people have had no experience or bad experience. Many people are not able to present their needs to a group -- many may not really know what they are or don¹t' know how to articulate them. To present them to a group of strangers talking about a concept like cohousing that they have never heard of before is not possible for them. One could argue that in this case they would not be good candidates for cohousing but that again limits diversity in cohousing. If we feel that cohousing is a good way to live, we may have to be a bit more proactive in reaching out to people who attend just one meeting and don't return. This is certainly difficult when there is so much work to do but the fact remains some people who would be very good members of cohousing communities are not included because of the ways that cohousing is presented, however, unwittingly. This limits the building of new communities in ways that I'm not sure are necessary to preserving the integrity of cohousing. With the inexperienced presenting to the even more inexperienced, misunderstandings and artificial barriers are inevitable, and limit diversity. Blaming the victim is not always the best answer. Sharon -- In Washington DC where all roads lead to Casablanca _______________________________________________ Cohousing-L mailing list Cohousing-L [at] cohousing.org Unsubscribe and other info: http://www.communityforum.net/mailman/listinfo/cohousing-l
- Re: Re: [C-L] Diversity in Cohousing, (continued)
- Re: Re: [C-L] Diversity in Cohousing Elizabeth Stevenson, July 12 2002
- Diversity in Cohousing Sharon Villines, July 12 2002
- Re: Diversity in Cohousing Racheli Gai, July 13 2002
- Re: Diversity in Cohousing Elizabeth Stevenson, July 13 2002
- Re: Diversity in Cohousing Sharon Villines, July 13 2002
- Re: Diversity in Cohousing Racheli Gai, July 13 2002
- Re: Motivations and Realities Howard Landman, June 28 2002
- Re: Motivations and Realities Racheli Gai, June 28 2002
Results generated by Tiger Technologies Web hosting using MHonArc.