Re: Re: the microflat as a module in affordable inner urban design | <– Date –> <– Thread –> |
From: Sharon Villines (sharon![]() |
|
Date: Sun, 14 Jul 2002 11:41:04 -0600 (MDT) |
on 7/14/2002 1:38 PM, Jock Coats at jock.coats [at] oxfordlibdems.org.uk wrote: > But what if you also 'owned' what you were renting? You would have the > power to control what you were paying. Since it was not built for > profit the mortgage would be lower if you had to borrow to build it and > so on. This is the sort of model I am looking at for Oxford - > co-operative co-housing. Could you explain how this would work? Sharon -- Sharon Villines Takoma Village Cohousing, Washington DC http://www.takomavillage.org _______________________________________________ Cohousing-L mailing list Cohousing-L [at] cohousing.org Unsubscribe and other info: http://www.communityforum.net/mailman/listinfo/cohousing-l
- Re: Re: the microflat as a module in affordable inner urban design, (continued)
-
Re: Re: the microflat as a module in affordable inner urban design Jock Coats, July 14 2002
- Re: Re: the microflat as a module in affordable inner urban design Jock Coats, July 14 2002
-
Re: Re: the microflat as a module in affordable inner urban design Sharon Villines, July 14 2002
- Re: Re: the microflat as a module in affordable inner urban design Jock Coats, July 14 2002
- Re: Re: the microflat as a module in affordable inner urban design Sharon Villines, July 14 2002
- Re: Re: the microflat as a module in affordable inner urban design Jock Coats, July 14 2002
- Re: Re: the microflat as a module in affordable inner urban design Sharon Villines, July 15 2002
-
Re: Re: the microflat as a module in affordable inner urban design Jock Coats, July 14 2002
- Re: Re: the microflat as a module in affordable inner urbandesign Anne Jackson, July 16 2002
- Re: Re: the microflat as a module in affordable inner urbandesign Sharon Villines, July 16 2002
Results generated by Tiger Technologies Web hosting using MHonArc.