Re: Ownership (was: Re: the microflat as a module in affordable inner urban)
From: Jock Coats (jock.coatsoxfordlibdems.org.uk)
Date: Sun, 14 Jul 2002 19:14:06 -0600 (MDT)
Howard Landman wrote:

they are still perpetuating a myth that ownership is the only really desirable form of tenure and pandering to that. It would be my contention that if the same principles were applied to building not-for-profit housing for community ownership renting would not be 'dead money'
                79 YOUR OWN HOME
        
        ... according to THE FAMILY (75), each individual household
        should be part of a larger family group household.  Whether this
        is so, or not, each individual household, must also have a
        territory of its own which it controls completely - HOUSE FOR A
        SMALL FAMILY (76), HOUSE FOR A COUPLE (77), HOUSE FOR ONE PERSON
        (78); this pattern, which simply sets down the need for such a
        territory, helps especially to form higher density house clusters
        like ROW HOUSES (38), HOUSING HILL (39), which often do not have
        well-defined individual territories for the separate households.

                                * * *
        
        * People cannot be genuinely comfortable and healthy in a house
        * which is not theirs.  All forms of rental - whether from private
        * landlords or public housing agencies - work against the natural
        * processes which allow people to form stable, self-healing
        * communities.
Hmmm...I can follow the logic, but tell that to the Germans or the Swedes who not only seem to be happy renting largely (especially in fact until families are 'out of the way') but also have some fantastic rented property.

        * Do everything possible to make the traditional forms of rental
        * impossible, indeed, illegal.  Give every household its own
        * home, with space enough for a garden. Keep the emphasis in the
        * definition of ownership on control, not on financial ownership.
        * Indeed, where it is possible to construct forms of ownership
        * which give people control over their houses and gardens, but
        * make financial speculation impossible, choose those forms
* above all others.
Okay - but there is a culture in the UK for example that portrays one's house as a 'safe investment' and in these days of higher mobility, yes, a speculative wealth accumulator, even for those who are not specifically setting out to 'speculate'. However I take the point about ownership and control and that is why a proper co-operative is a good model. It gives the community control and the occupant tenure - possibly more so than with mortgaged ownership in the current climate (banks here are now talking of fifty year mortgages - one will never truly own one's own home in one's own lifetime). There are even models of co-operative housing which allow for participation by leaseholders or owner occupiers as well in the overall running of the 'community' bits but give them the ability to do more than tenants in terms of what they want to do to their properties.

In the specific example of microflats with a tightly monitored market however, I stand by my contention. Elsewhere in Europe the people these are being aimed at would not yet be thinking of buying in many cases. And in this case it presents a real problem - enticing people in by telling them it's a step on the ladder but then restricting any capital growth they might make to much lower than the capital growth on the 'next step' on the ladder such is house price inflation.

However I would be happy with a model in which land value taxation made sure that the common weal benefitted properly from home ownership whilst doing more to dampen speculative ownership.

But it sounds like an interesting book all the same...:-)

Jock

--
+++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
+  Jock Coats, Oxford Liberal Democrats, M3a Morrell Hall, OX3 0TU  +
+       T:+44 1865 485019 M:+44 7769 695767 F:+44 845 1275714       +
+   E(pref):jock.coats [at] oxfordlibdems.org.uk Cix:jockox3 [at] cix.co.uk   +
+     W1:www.oxfordlibdems.org.uk W2:aldco.oxfordlibdems.org.uk     +
+++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++



_______________________________________________
Cohousing-L mailing list
Cohousing-L [at] cohousing.org  Unsubscribe  and other info:
http://www.communityforum.net/mailman/listinfo/cohousing-l

Results generated by Tiger Technologies Web hosting using MHonArc.