RE: Resale Policy | <– Date –> <– Thread –> |
From: Rob Sandelin (floriferous![]() |
|
Date: Tue, 12 Nov 2002 08:20:03 -0700 (MST) |
If you create a resale policy, be sure to run it by a representative of whatever funding source(s) that provide your mortgages . I have heard stories of banks refusing mortgages to cohousing buyers when the group creates a policy that is not in the interest of the lenders. We had something like this happen once when we adopted a membership policy which required buyers to read the cohousing book, attend three meetings, etc. We had an attorney review that, and on his recommendation, removed it from our agreements. Somehow the banks got a hold of an older copy of the agreements document and they refused to mortgage a house with those conditions, and we had to explain and send them a new revised agreements document that had the offending policy removed. In fact it had to be signed as verified by the officers of the board and notarized. Sheesh, what a hassle. At Sharingwood we only have a notification requirement before closing. The seller has to provide the board with the name of the seller, mortgage and escrow company 10 days before closing. Failure to do so can nullify the sale. This is just a heads up to the board to ensure any unpaid assessments are dealt with, and we can notify the escrow and lender of any such liens. Although, they have their own processes, and whenever a home has sold here, the bank asks for a budget and assessment statement, among other things. If you try to limit the equity on a bank financed house, you might also violate state law. Might want to check with an attorney about this. States all have different laws regarding changing the status of a Condo, and by creating equity limitations you are changing the status. Usually the mortgages must be notified some amount of time prior to any such decision, and in some condos the mortgage (bank providing the mortgage) holds the voting rights on the unit. I know of a non-cohousing condo association that tried to go Coop, and were totally shocked to find out that in the fine print of their condo declarations, that the mortagee held the voting rights to the units, and they actually held 82% of the votes in that situation, and voted against the coop, usurping the votes of the actual onsite mortgage holders. Needless to say, it was an unhappy scene, that was tangled in lawyers and court stuff, but in the end, the banks prevailed and the association had to pay the legal fees to boot! So check your Condo declarations carefully if you change your condo in such a way that might cause a problem for your lenders. Rob Sandelin Sharingwood --- Outgoing mail is certified Virus Free. Checked by AVG anti-virus system (http://www.grisoft.com). Version: 6.0.332 / Virus Database: 186 - Release Date: 3/6/02 _______________________________________________ Cohousing-L mailing list Cohousing-L [at] cohousing.org Unsubscribe and other info: http://www.communityforum.net/mailman/listinfo/cohousing-l
-
Car share club Fred H Olson, November 11 2002
-
Re: Car share club Cheryl DeWolfe, November 11 2002
-
Resale Policy Diane Margolis, November 11 2002
- RE: Resale Policy Casey Morrigan, November 11 2002
- RE: Resale Policy Rob Sandelin, November 12 2002
-
Resale Policy Diane Margolis, November 11 2002
- Re: Resale Policy Jim Snyder-Grant, November 11 2002
- Re: Resale Policy Howard Landman, November 12 2002
-
Re: Car share club Cheryl DeWolfe, November 11 2002
-
Re: Car share club Diane Simpson, November 11 2002
- RE: Car share club Rob Sandelin, November 13 2002
Results generated by Tiger Technologies Web hosting using MHonArc.