re: fire regulations | <– Date –> <– Thread –> |
From: Ted Chesky (tchesky![]() |
|
Date: Tue, 12 Nov 2002 21:25:03 -0700 (MST) |
At Great Oak Cohousing in Ann Arbor MI (now under construction) we had to jump through a lot of hoops to get our site plan approved. After much wrangling we were able to avoid having a fire access ring around the community, but we had to agree to sprinkler several buildings on the side away from the parking lot. Surprisingly, we were also able to get the fire department to admit that their trucks have a reverse gear, and were able to create a couple of dead-end access paths into the center of the community, rather than a road all the way through. Both of these were an improvement over what the nearby Sunward Cohousing, the pioneer development in this area, got stuck with. Their development had to be completely driveable, inside & out, with no backing up. Unfortunately the township utilities people got into the act and insisted that we connect the dead-end access points, so now we have an 18-foot interstate down the middle of the community so some sewer engineer can drive a pickup truck through every ten years or so. But we're not bitter. And yes, sprinklers are expensive. So are those grass pavers, from what I hear. They sound great, though. Ted Chesky tchesky [at] earthlink.net 734.677.3094 A more frequently checked address: ted [at] design-hub.com _______________________________________________ Cohousing-L mailing list Cohousing-L [at] cohousing.org Unsubscribe and other info: http://www.communityforum.net/mailman/listinfo/cohousing-l
-
Re: fire regulations Lynn Nadeau, November 8 2002
- RE: Re: fire regulations sbraun, November 8 2002
- re: fire regulations Ted Chesky, November 12 2002
- Re: re: fire regulations Sharon Villines, November 12 2002
Results generated by Tiger Technologies Web hosting using MHonArc.