Re: Development Financial Structure | <– Date –> <– Thread –> |
From: Sharon Villines (sharon![]() |
|
Date: Tue, 19 Nov 2002 13:51:01 -0700 (MST) |
On 11/19/02 2:58 PM, "Jeff Coffin" <jcoffin [at] brown-dog.org> wrote: > If by "you have made all the decisions" you mean the site, common > house and unit planning, then yeah, that's what we're setting up. I > do not expect that we'll make all the decisions "about the community > and how it will be" before we move in. I fully expect to tune and > tweak ad nauseum over time; with more members being added as soon as > we start getting the palns in front of the city. Community members need to make decisions together because decision making forces them to understand all their values in and to learn how to work out conflicts. But there is no lack of decision-making opportunities in cohousing. Any time you want to make a decision, there will be at least a dozen to choose from. If we started listing decisions that various communities are facing today, it would go on for a week and all our mailboxes would stuffed. As long as there is a core large enough to plan a building that will be acceptable to a wide variety of potential members, there is no reason they shouldn't go ahead and plan it. In truth there are only so many alternatives to choose from. Most decisions are dictated by money, timing, site location, zoning, building regulations, etc. And many of them will have to be remade later anyway. If not in 5 years, 10. We come together as a developer driven community and were moved in in record time. But of the people who discovered after move-in that the community didn't work like they expected it to, I see no correlation between first joiners and late comers. People who were very active in the group formation for three years before they moved in have expresses the same levels of satisfaction and dissatisfaction as those who moved in less than a year after joining when "all the decisions" had been made. Some spouses who were very apprehensive about moving in and had almost no contact with the group before moving in, have become very active and happy members. While community development is essential and community control over the whole living experience is essential, I don¹t think full control over the building process is as important as many of the early groups felt it was. Once you move in, you start assuming your place and your responsibilities in the community in the same way you do before move in. The measure is more likely to be the length of time together and the degree of engagement during that time, not whether you were engaged in choosing bathroom tile or not. Bringing this back to the topic of financial structure, insisting that everyone has to participate in all the decisions and the whole group has to form and then build a complex, will doom the endeavor. Sharon -- Sharon Villines Takoma Village Cohousing, Washington DC http://www.takomavillage.org _______________________________________________ Cohousing-L mailing list Cohousing-L [at] cohousing.org Unsubscribe and other info: http://www.communityforum.net/mailman/listinfo/cohousing-l
- Re: Development Financial Structure, (continued)
- Re: Development Financial Structure Kay Argyle, November 27 2002
- Re: Development Financial Structure Jeff Coffin, November 19 2002
- Re: Development Financial Structure Elizabeth Stevenson, November 19 2002
- Re: Development Financial Structure Jeff Coffin, November 20 2002
- Re: Development Financial Structure Sharon Villines, November 19 2002
- RE: Development Financial Structure Rob Sandelin, November 19 2002
- Do cohousers care about "bricks and sticks"? Racheli Gai, November 20 2002
- Re: Do cohousers care about "bricks and sticks"? Gary Kent, November 20 2002
- Re: Do cohousers care about "bricks and sticks"? Racheli Gai, November 20 2002
Results generated by Tiger Technologies Web hosting using MHonArc.