Re: Is living cooperatively an ideology of itself? | <– Date –> <– Thread –> |
From: Elizabeth Stevenson (tamgoddess![]() |
|
Date: Wed, 5 Feb 2003 14:29:01 -0700 (MST) |
Well, there are examples of cooperative living in conservative groups, especially religious groups. However, I think that for the most part, he's right. I read somewhere that political conservatives have more nightmares and tend to be more negative in their estimation of people's motives. It seems that it's more of a personality type than a true choice whether you're progressive or conservative. Seen in a more holistic way, it's all a part of the same thing, your personality, your ideology, and your willingness to live cooperatively. Liz Stevenson > From: "Rob Sandelin" <floriferous [at] msn.com> > Reply-To: cohousing-l [at] cohousing.org > Date: Wed, 5 Feb 2003 13:40:39 -0800 > To: <cohousing-l [at] cohousing.org> > Subject: [C-L]_Is living cooperatively an ideology of itself? > > > I have a random email conversation with a person who describes himself as an > arch conservative. He posts a web log on a lot of topics and we met when he > posted a letter to the editor I wrote, then critiqued it from his political > standpoint. Anyway, in describing cohousing he calls it a liberal ideology > to want to live together cooperatively. Given the kind of people I > continually meet from cooperative living, It got me thinking that he is > right. > > To live together cooperatively requires lots of time talking with, learning > about, and learning how to trust the people you live with. It often means > accepting peoples differences, learning how to compromise and adjust your > personal desires to meld with the desires of others. This are actions that > liberals do well. > > Are these ideological actions? If an ideology is a system of beliefs, then > isn't cooperative living full of social beliefs which initiate actions? > > And if so, how could cohousing ever be non-ideological? > > In a SWAG (silly wild ass guess) I would say 85% of the people I have met > involved in cooperative living, with whom I have some idea of their > politics, are political liberals. > > Rob Sandelin > Sky Valley Environments <http://www.nonprofitpages.com/nica/SVE.htm> > Field skills training for student naturalists > Floriferous [at] msn.com > > > -----Original Message----- > From: cohousing-l-admin [at] cohousing.org > [mailto:cohousing-l-admin [at] cohousing.org]On Behalf Of Sharon Villines > Sent: Wednesday, February 05, 2003 7:48 AM > To: cohousing-l [at] cohousing.org > Subject: Re: [C-L]_Re: Cohousing Mainstream > > > > > On Monday, February 3, 2003, at 06:07 PM, Mac & Sandy Thomson wrote: > >> I don't know whether cohousing will ever become mainstream (whatever >> that >> is), but I'd sure like to see it become MUCH more available. [snip] >> I like that cohousing has no ideology other than an intension to live >> in >> greater harmony with our neighbors. IMHO, discouraging non-liberals >> who >> seek community from joining cohousing unnecessarily stifles the growth >> of >> cohousing and the richness of diversity found therein. > > The ideas and organizing methods will become more mainstream without > being "labeled" cohousing. Neighbors are already asking us "how do you > do that." We have several very organized neighborhood associations who > are interested in concepts of conflict resolution and shared resources. > These are the skills that will feed community development. > > The image of a group of people building new homes centered around a > commonhouse is not likely to > "become the norm" but that isn't what brings most of us to cohousing. > That format only enables it in our current housing situation. Infill or > building communities in existing housing would be just as satisfying as > a living situation. For now, the new communities are just easier since > it allows people who are already thinking along similar lines to find > each other without displacing or rearranging whole neighborhoods of > people. > > Sharon > ----- > Sharon Villines > Takoma Village Cohousing, Washington DC > http://www.takomavillage.org > > _______________________________________________ > Cohousing-L mailing list > Cohousing-L [at] cohousing.org Unsubscribe and other info: > http://www.cohousing.org/cohousing-L > > --- > Incoming mail is certified Virus Free. > Checked by AVG anti-virus system (http://www.grisoft.com). > Version: 6.0.332 / Virus Database: 186 - Release Date: 3/6/02 > > --- > Outgoing mail is certified Virus Free. > Checked by AVG anti-virus system (http://www.grisoft.com). > Version: 6.0.332 / Virus Database: 186 - Release Date: 3/6/02 > > _______________________________________________ > Cohousing-L mailing list > Cohousing-L [at] cohousing.org Unsubscribe and other info: > http://www.cohousing.org/cohousing-L _______________________________________________ Cohousing-L mailing list Cohousing-L [at] cohousing.org Unsubscribe and other info: http://www.cohousing.org/cohousing-L
-
Re: Cohousing mainstream Raines Cohen, February 3 2003
-
Re: Cohousing Mainstream Mac & Sandy Thomson, February 3 2003
-
Re: Re: Cohousing Mainstream Sharon Villines, February 5 2003
- Is living cooperatively an ideology of itself? Rob Sandelin, February 5 2003
- Re: Is living cooperatively an ideology of itself? Elizabeth Stevenson, February 5 2003
- Re: Is living cooperatively an ideology of itself? Sharon Villines, February 5 2003
- Re: Is living cooperatively an ideology of itself? Elizabeth Stevenson, February 5 2003
-
Re: Re: Cohousing Mainstream Sharon Villines, February 5 2003
- Re: Is living cooperatively an ideology of itself? racheli, February 5 2003
- Re: Is living cooperatively an ideology of itself? Diane Simpson, February 5 2003
-
Re: Cohousing Mainstream Mac & Sandy Thomson, February 3 2003
Results generated by Tiger Technologies Web hosting using MHonArc.