Re: Is living cooperatively an ideology of itself? | <– Date –> <– Thread –> |
From: Jeanne Goodman (GoodmanJ![]() |
|
Date: Thu, 6 Feb 2003 05:20:02 -0700 (MST) |
I don't think the question has anything to do with who is *let* into a community. It has to do with who would *want* to live in a community. I try to think of the past that I never knew...at the dawn of suburbs. Which I know only from old television shows. In those representations, it's often the very conservative families who are most tied into their neighborhoods. It's a bad science, I know, but bear with me. I think the ideology has less to do with liberalism vs. conservativism than one's historical perspective. Do you imagine community with a psychological foot planted in the sixties? Does that make you long to put on your tie-dye shirt or does it make you shudder? Or do you imagine community with a psychological foot planted in "Father Knows Best?" THIS ... more than your political views is IMO what determines whether you seek out or shun community. I think that conservatives often look at community with disdain because they are imagining something sixties-ish (thus Diane's ashram comment) Jeanne ----- Original Message ----- From: Greg Dunn To: cohousing-l [at] cohousing.org Sent: Thursday, February 06, 2003 03:57 Subject: RE: [C-L]_Is living cooperatively an ideology of itself? I guess I still don't buy that there is a 1-to-1 correlation between the desire to share community and left-of-center politics; and therefore I don't think politics should be the determinant of whether you let someone into your cohousing community or not. I think the determinant should be whether a candidate can show that they will contribute in a positive way to the community, and be basically kind and cooperative with their neighbors, and be willing and able to participate in the community life. I still say that if you can find someone who can be like that even though they have very different beliefs and even values than you, you're lucky, because they'll help keep you honest. Of course, everyone is free (within the bounds of the law) to form whatever sort of community they want, so I'm just talking about the community I'd most like to see and be part of. The metaphor that occurs to me (for the person evaluating a prospective community member) is that of an NBA talent scout. He is undoubtedly aware that a disproportionately high percentage of big-time NBA stars are black. He may well let that knowledge influence how and where he allocates his recruiting time. But in the end, his job is to evaluate people on how they play basketball, not the color of their skin (*or* their political affiliations). There are a few white, Latino, and Asian guys (probably even some under 7'5" tall) who can play with the best. They may bring something very special to the team, precisely because they *are* different. Greg Dunn _______________________________________________ Cohousing-L mailing list Cohousing-L [at] cohousing.org Unsubscribe and other info: http://www.cohousing.org/cohousing-L
- Re: Is living cooperatively an ideology of itself?, (continued)
- Re: Is living cooperatively an ideology of itself? Elizabeth Stevenson, February 5 2003
- Re: Is living cooperatively an ideology of itself? racheli, February 5 2003
- Re: Is living cooperatively an ideology of itself? Diane Simpson, February 5 2003
- RE: Is living cooperatively an ideology of itself? Greg Dunn, February 5 2003
- Re: Is living cooperatively an ideology of itself? Jeanne Goodman, February 6 2003
- RE: Is living cooperatively an ideology of itself? racheli, February 6 2003
Results generated by Tiger Technologies Web hosting using MHonArc.