Repeat Question. Request to not talk at mtgs. | <– Date –> <– Thread –> |
From: Becky Schaller (bschaller![]() |
|
Date: Sun, 23 Feb 2003 13:37:01 -0700 (MST) |
This past Thursday, I wrote an email to this listserve asking if other communities have discussed how they might respond if a member requests that the community not talk about a particular issue which they think is personal and others in the community think is a community issue. So now I'd like to know if anyone has any insights about facilitating such a discussion. Perhaps what sub-questions we might want to try to answer. I'm anticipating that we might either have a hard time getting away from the details of our own situation and fall into the who-was-right? trap. Or we might think about the question in such broad terms that we won't be able to come up with any guidelines for the future. So if anyone has any input about how to handle such a situation, I'd appreicate it if you'd let me know. Thanks, Becky Schaller Tucson, AZ **************************************************************************** Date: Thu, 20 Feb 2003 10:46:04 -0700 Some time ago, a member asked that the community not talk about a particular issue at general meetings or committee meetings. This was an intensely personal issue for the family which also had community wide implications. After a couple months, we finally did start talking. We asked Laird Schaub to come and help us deal with this issue and I think we moved forward considerably during the time he was here. He pointed out to us that one reason we were having difficulty with knowing how to respond to this request was that we had never discussed the possibility of being requested not to talk about an issue in meetings. We had never discussed the mega-question, How does the community respond if someone asks that we not talk about a particular subject at community and committee meetings? Under what situations do we honor that request and under what situations do we say that we aren't going to honor that request? The issue was not only very divisive within the community, the request was also divisive. Some people identified more strongly with the personal nature of the issue and believed that the community should honor the privacy of this family. Others identified more strongly with the community nature of the issue and found the request to not talk to be very difficult. I am one of the people who volunteered to lead the community in a discussion of the mega-question. I'd like to have a little more background information before we actually have this discussion. Have other communities had such conversations? If so, how did it go and would you be willing to share any of the content or results with us? _______________________________________________ Cohousing-L mailing list Cohousing-L [at] cohousing.org Unsubscribe and other info: http://www.cohousing.org/cohousing-L
- (no other messages in thread)
Results generated by Tiger Technologies Web hosting using MHonArc.