Re: RE: Request to not talk at meetings | <– Date –> <– Thread –> |
From: Sharon Villines (sharon![]() |
|
Date: Mon, 24 Feb 2003 15:57:03 -0700 (MST) |
We just had a very intense weekend with Laird Schaub that centered on resolving conflicts. In one of the small sessions one person became very emotional and was concerned about how the situation would be portrayed to the larger group. The person wasn't suggesting that it be kept a secret but wanted some care taken in describing what happened.
Laird made suggestions about how to describe what happened, characterizing it in straight forward non-toxic language that the persons involved were comfortable with and explained what was being done to further attend to hurt feelings.
Doing this relieved the tension in the whole group and removed the need for further discussion. Acknowledging a situation is much better than trying to "ignore the pink elephant in the corner." It allows everyone to relax and let the parties involved work it out. When the affected parties can approve the explanation, it helps them feel that they are being treated compassionately and presented as adults who are under control and can handle their problems without help.
Sharon ----- Sharon Villines Takoma Village Cohousing, Washington DC http://www.takomavillage.org _______________________________________________ Cohousing-L mailing list Cohousing-L [at] cohousing.org Unsubscribe and other info: http://www.cohousing.org/cohousing-L
-
request to not talk at meetings Becky Schaller, February 20 2003
-
RE: Request to not talk at meetings TR Ruddick, February 24 2003
- Re: RE: Request to not talk at meetings Sharon Villines, February 24 2003
-
RE: Request to not talk at meetings TR Ruddick, February 24 2003
Results generated by Tiger Technologies Web hosting using MHonArc.