RE: Other--can coho include for-profit activities | <– Date –> <– Thread –> |
From: Rob Sandelin (floriferous![]() |
|
Date: Wed, 4 Jun 2003 18:03:01 -0600 (MDT) |
For starters, unless something has changed, the term cohousing is no longer a registered trademark, thus you can define it anyway you want. There is lots of variation in what cohousing looks like and there will be lots more in the future. So don't let "The official cohousing organization" try to define your cohousing community for you, its yours to create however you want. There is a long history of people being uptight about what cohousing is and isn't and you are free to ignore them. I do. I know a couple of cohousing groups, including Arcata Marsh and Pioneer Valley have commercial space as part of their cohousing groups. I also recall a couple others have setup so that members get paid for work, for example I am pretty sure that the family that runs the farm at Eco-village at Ithaca runs a community supported business, and there were a couple of other such examples I am not remembering where. So employment or business is not necessarily a impossible thing to have within cohousing, but it is very difficult to setup both a community and a business at the same time. I think trying to do both at once would end up failing. However, if you could attract existing business owners to become members of the cohousing, you could easily then design and build space in common to support those in some way. You need to be careful here though, I have heard of a couple of groups that built space to support a members business who then left, and the space goes unused. So you want to be sure you could lease such a space to non-members in such a situation. It is also very unlikely that one business could support 24-30 households anyway, so a variety of business opportunities would be the best approach. It would make perfect sense for example, if there was support within a membership, to build a business space onto the commonhouse which would then be leased by the businesses within the community. In this way, businesses could share resources and the community as a whole could use the lease money for parties and other fun things. Depending upon the situation, having onsite employment could be a huge boon for a cohousing group. The important thing I think which differentiates cohousing is that working in such a business should not be mandatory, but an option available. Many intentional Communities with onsite business arrangement require members to work in the community business. This is what I think is the critical difference between the two. Rob Sandelin South Snohomish County at the headwaters of Ricci Creek Sky Valley Environments <http://www.nonprofitpages.com/nica/SVE.htm> Field skills training for student naturalists Floriferous [at] msn.com --- Outgoing mail is certified Virus Free. Checked by AVG anti-virus system (http://www.grisoft.com). Version: 6.0.332 / Virus Database: 186 - Release Date: 3/6/02 _______________________________________________ Cohousing-L mailing list Cohousing-L [at] cohousing.org Unsubscribe and other info: http://www.cohousing.org/cohousing-L
-
RE: Other--can coho include for-profit activities TR Ruddick, June 3 2003
- RE: Other--can coho include for-profit activities Rob Sandelin, June 4 2003
Results generated by Tiger Technologies Web hosting using MHonArc.