Re: Board of directors setting boundaries | <– Date –> <– Thread –> |
From: Cheryl Charis-Graves (ccharis![]() |
|
Date: Fri, 25 Jul 2003 16:58:12 -0600 (MDT) |
> ---Individual members ot the board are called at home and expected to > immediately step in and handle situations that arise over the course of > the day. > > ---Issues that fall within the pervue of our teams are being sent directly > to the board, rather than first to the relevant team, with a carbon copy > to the board so that the board is aware of the issue but not immediately > responsible for responding to it. What's the point of having teams at all > if everything goes straight to the board for action? I, too, am on our board of directors -- we call ourselves the "coordinating council." I get a lot of questions directed my way, but I do think our comm'ty respects time/space as far as not expecting board members to be "on call" all the time. They have expressed more concern about board members burning out with too many demands on them, so I think they do try to lessen the burden when they can. We ? after MUCH discussion ? changed from the team structure to a "point person" system. Each person has responsibility for a "cluster" of tasks, e.g. Turf maintenance. Point persons don't necessarily have to do the work itself, but they coordinate the tasks required and are responsible for making sure the task gets done, possibly by a work crew on comm'ty work days. Each coordinating council rep is responsible for coordinating the tasks of 4-5 point people, e.g., buildings, grounds, finances. We don't have team meetings anymore, as individuals are responsible for their specific areas. The list of "tasks" came from the teams, and was split into "critical" and "non-critical." We're a year + into it. In some ways, it works well for some people. Having fewer meetings is WAY better for a lot of people. You would think the lines of responsibility are clear, but they're not always. But we're 7 years into it, so have worked through a lot of stuff already. And still, it's a struggle to figure out how to get certain things done. I have a couple of suggestions: 1. Say in a friendly-but-firm voice what YOUR boundaries are, e.g. Please feel free to contact me when ... Be specific. Time, circumstance, after they've checked the manual, whatever. Then, when someone forgets, and they will, say you'd be happy to talk with them ... (time, circumstance, etc.) 2. If the issue comes before the board without going to the team, refer it on to the team. If you handle it, the expectation will be that you will continue to handle such things in the future. Remind the comm'ty at your comm'ty meeting, but the most powerful action you have is to simply NOT act on the issue and turn it over to the most appropriate team. Will it take more time? Yes, that's partly why we did what we did. But you do have a team structure in place, and that's where those actions need to occur. My .02 anyway, -- Cheryl Charis-Graves Harmony Village Cohousing Golden, Colorado http://www.harmonyvillage.org _______________________________________________ Cohousing-L mailing list Cohousing-L [at] cohousing.org Unsubscribe and other info: http://www.cohousing.org/cohousing-L
-
Board of directors setting boundaries Fred H Olson, July 25 2003
- Re: Board of directors setting boundaries Cheryl Charis-Graves, July 25 2003
- RE: Board of directors setting boundaries Rob Sandelin, July 26 2003
- Re: Board of directors setting boundaries Joani Blank, July 28 2003
- Re: Board of directors setting boundaries Sue Stigleman, August 8 2003
- RE: Board of directors setting boundaries Sue Stigleman, August 8 2003
Results generated by Tiger Technologies Web hosting using MHonArc.