Re: marketing question | <– Date –> <– Thread –> |
From: Jim Rebman (seamus![]() |
|
Date: Tue, 10 Feb 2004 11:31:55 -0700 (MST) |
I tend to agree with most of your points, but the fact is that in Boulder, with the *average* price of a home being $400k, it doesn't look all that upscale relative to the local market. Actually, for the square footage and quality of construction, these homes are really kind of a bargain in this market, as absurd as it may sound. -- Jim (soon to be moving into Wild Sage -- mid March) > FWIW, I say even the most "cohousing" of the ads is not "cohousing" enough. > Drop the icky "upscale" pseudo-word (at nearly half a mil, I think just > about everyone *gets* that it's pricey)... _______________________________________________ Cohousing-L mailing list Cohousing-L [at] cohousing.org Unsubscribe and other info: http://www.cohousing.org/cohousing-L
-
marketing question Lon Goldstein, February 10 2004
-
Re: marketing question Elizabeth Stevenson, February 10 2004
- Re: marketing question Jim Rebman, February 10 2004
- Re: marketing question Elizabeth Stevenson, February 10 2004
-
Re: marketing question Elizabeth Stevenson, February 10 2004
-
Re: marketing question Sharon Villines, February 10 2004
- Re: marketing question Sharon Villines, February 10 2004
- RE: marketing question Fleck, February 10 2004
Results generated by Tiger Technologies Web hosting using MHonArc.