Re: SELF DEVELOPMENT VS PROFESSIONAL DEVELOPER | <– Date –> <– Thread –> |
From: Norm Gauss (normangauss11![]() |
|
Date: Wed, 28 Jul 2004 18:53:28 -0700 (PDT) |
If risk is a major concern in raising money for a cohousing project, then it makes sense to minimize risk if you can. A major concern of any residential development is the marketability of its homes. If there are comparable developments in your local area, then you have a good idea of what will sell. If your project is the first in your area, then you are more likely to fly blind and your risk is indeed high. Once you have arrived at a reliable projected selling price, this should remain as a constant restraint to your urges to incorporate esthetic features into your project that are nice but not critical, as long as you have a feeling for the cost. This is where advice from a consultant or developer would be helpful. In our project without a consultant or developer, the architect designed 5 floor plans for 31 residential units, but he could not give us cost estimates and could not tell us how much extra features cost. So we gave ourselves the luxury of micromanaging the architectural process by introducing variations on the original plans. Some of our members introduced their ideas of what they would like, and these became officially new floor plans. No thought was given to how marketable these new plans might be. And after the architect drew up these new floor plans (at extra cost), some members who submitted the new ideas left us, and we inherited plans that no current member had designed. We even launched into flights of fancy contemplating a large photovoltaic solar power system, a system of cooling tubes buried under our common house, a gray water collection and recycling system, a two-tiered reflecting pool, and an unlined swimming pond in an area where water is in short supply. Without a controlling entity telling us the impact of such ideas on the long term financial health of our project, we were lead to spend serious time thinking about these proposals. In the end, we dropped the idea of a swimming pool, only to have the idea re-introduced later when creative financing found the funds. Designing portions of our project ourselves was very satisfying and brought us together. But without anybody controlling the direction of our ideas based on financial or engineering constraints, we were flying blind. We succeeded in the end by partnering with a developer who helped us price our units, obtained a construction loan and oversaw the construction operation. Norm Gauss Oak Creek Commons Paso Robles, CA
- Re: SELF DEVELOPMENT VS PROFESSIONAL DEVELOPER, (continued)
- Re: SELF DEVELOPMENT VS PROFESSIONAL DEVELOPER Sharon Villines, July 24 2004
- Re: SELF DEVELOPMENT VS PROFESSIONAL DEVELOPER Tree Bressen, July 24 2004
-
Re: SELF DEVELOPMENT VS PROFESSIONAL DEVELOPER Sharon Villines, July 24 2004
-
Re: SELF DEVELOPMENT VS PROFESSIONAL DEVELOPER Chris ScottHanson, July 28 2004
- Re: SELF DEVELOPMENT VS PROFESSIONAL DEVELOPER Norm Gauss, July 28 2004
- Re: SELF DEVELOPMENT VS PROFESSIONAL DEVELOPER Gary Kent, July 29 2004
- RC Summary Ron Skene, July 29 2004
-
Re: SELF DEVELOPMENT VS PROFESSIONAL DEVELOPER Chris ScottHanson, July 28 2004
Results generated by Tiger Technologies Web hosting using MHonArc.