RE: SELF DEVELOPMENT VS PROFESSIONAL DEVELOPER | <– Date –> <– Thread –> |
From: MerylD (MerylD![]() |
|
Date: Wed, 28 Jul 2004 05:43:33 -0700 (PDT) |
Hi all: South Florida cohousing in Delray, Florida, recently went belly-up, and the reason was the professional developer the group has been working with for several years. So for anyone who thinks a professional developer is a panacea, be advised that this was not the case for us, despite our initial hopes and excitement. After an earlier attempt at self-development went under after years of work and countless thousands of dollars, the group that re-formed decided there was no way we were going to go forward if it meant putting more of our own money on the line. We eventually found a very experienced local developer who specialized in small, niche projects and seemed very interested in cohousing, and was willing to act like a traditional developer (i.e., front all the money and make his profit from the sale of the units). After a year in which he educated himself about cohousing took very little action, he eventually decided to purchase the property from one of our members (the same site where the original group planned to develop) and create the cohousing community we dreamed of. Over the past three years the developer worked closely with us to design the site plan, floor plans and the 3000-sq-ft common house (he even agreed to meet with a fung shui expert per the request of one of our members). The plans were fabulous and just what we asked for, and the projected prices reasonable for the area. We seemed to have found the perfect situation for creating cohousing without having to expend our own money. The developer had told us that approvals would take less than a year. But despite his supposed expertise and his many resources, that process actually ended up taking nearly two years, costing us members of the group who burnt out and moved on (don't forget, some in this group had already been waiting years and years for a project to happen). I'm not sure why there was such a delay and whether, had we self-developed, we would have been able to move faster, but two years is a very long time for a project that had already, in a slightly different but not radically different form, had already been approved by the county commission and others. But two months ago came the worst part of working with a professional developer, giving clear meaning to that old saw about the Golden Rule--he who has the gold makes the rules. The developer first declared that members should come to his sales representative and sign the contract for their unit, but he declined to let members review the contract in advance. After an uproar from group members who wanted to allow their attorneys to review the contract before signing, he did reneg on that decree. But a few days later, after he got some bids back from subcontractors that were much higher than expected due to a concrete shortage in Florida--a material all houses are made from here--he unilaterally declared that he was rescinding his reservation agreements with group members, and that prices would be dramatically increased. Whether that is legal or not is still being discussed by group members, but in any event we all became very clear that this is not a developer we can trust. It wasn't even so much the increase in price; had the developer come to the group and said, the bids are extremely high and I want to show you my proforma and work with the group to see how we can still make this project feasible, which may entail raising prices, I know I for one would have happily agreed. But by declaring that despite his own written agreement locking in a unit at a given price, he would not honor his pricing commitment, his actions led group members to lose our confidence that he would build the quality houses he has promised. A relationship with any builder must be based on trust, that the plans that look so great on paper will translate into a home that his as wonderful to live in, and his actions caused us to lose that trust completely. So group members decided with very heavy hearts not to go forward with the project. After 10 years of effort, South Florida remains without a cohousing community. (The developer still owns the land, and says he still plans to move forward with our site plan, but it will not be a cohousing community.) I would like to say our situation is a lesson that a group must check out any potential developer carefully, but we did so when we first hooked up with this company, and years of meeting with its president gave us no indication of what was to come. If a developer is planning to live in the community (which ours was not), perhaps you can feel surer that he will act with integrity and your best interest at heart. But otherwise all I can say is to not fall into the trap of believing that if you get a professional developer onboard, all your prayers will be answered. Love & light- Meryl Davids of the now defunct Emerald Place cohousing Delray Beach, Florida > >Hi > >Just had a long talk with a coho developer about the pitfalls of > >self-development of a coho community. She recommended that I ask you all if > >you know of cohos which were self-developed (without a developer) and which > >came in time and on budget. > >
- RE: SELF DEVELOPMENT VS PROFESSIONAL DEVELOPER, (continued)
- RE: SELF DEVELOPMENT VS PROFESSIONAL DEVELOPER Casey Morrigan, July 26 2004
-
RE: SELF DEVELOPMENT VS PROFESSIONAL DEVELOPER Eris Weaver, July 27 2004
-
Re: RE: SELF DEVELOPMENT VS PROFESSIONAL DEVELOPER Sharon Villines, July 27 2004
- Re: RE: SELF DEVELOPMENT VS PROFESSIONAL DEVELOPER Norm Gauss, July 27 2004
-
Re: RE: SELF DEVELOPMENT VS PROFESSIONAL DEVELOPER Sharon Villines, July 27 2004
- RE: SELF DEVELOPMENT VS PROFESSIONAL DEVELOPER MerylD, July 28 2004
- Re: RE: SELF DEVELOPMENT VS PROFESSIONAL DEVELOPER Sharon Villines, July 29 2004
- Re: SELF DEVELOPMENT VS PROFESSIONAL DEVELOPER Dahako, July 28 2004
Results generated by Tiger Technologies Web hosting using MHonArc.