The affordable cohousing myth vs development reality | <– Date –> <– Thread –> |
From: Rob Sandelin (floriferous![]() |
|
Date: Tue, 16 Nov 2004 10:30:02 -0800 (PST) |
Cohousing from scratch, which is the most common approach, is real estate development. If it were cheap and easy, everyone would do it. It is neither cheap nor easy. There is a balance point between things like cost of land that you can develop and local economics. You might find a cheap piece of land that you can develop into 30 homes, but often such places are far outside of the local job economy. So you have to find that balance between land cost and job market. In this balance you are competing against every private developer who wants the same thing in order to make money. Since these private developers are often well financed, experienced, and well connected, in developing markets they win the best sites. When you see $350,000 cohousing units, look around the non-cohousing neighborhood at the competing real estate. Almost always, that competition is a similar price range. If eco-developments were cheap and easy, there would be thousands of them. There are NONE in Washington state with 10 or more living spaces. Most places that call themselves ecovillages are farms which have skirted land use laws by having people live in substandard nonpermitted housing. Government agencies in most states have pounds of regulations that affect how land is used, how buildings can be built, etc. These regulations are in place usually to either protect the government from lawsuits or to protect land or people from shoddy development practices, and health and safety issues. Many IC's fly under the radar of these rules. Cohousing is bank financed, thus it has to abide by ALL the development game rules and be fully legally permitted. These two things, Bank financing and Legally permitted ensure that it is impossible to create real ecologically sustaining housing. In order to do serious ecologically sustainable building, you have to do private financing and either duck under or spend enormous time and money and effort to get legally permitted. Way out in the country you can do this, in developing areas, you find the scrutiny of the building inspector. Why are there not dozens of straw bale communities? Because only a tiny few financial places will fund them. So building 30 homes, which is sort of the standard scale of cohousing, anywhere, always costs millions of dollars, which then translates into market rate housing costs. If it is way over market rate, the banks typically balk at giving loans. Typically all the "savings" by being a not for profit development go into the commonhouse. Affordability comes not so much in building, as in mortgage subsidies. So, large scale (30 units or more) low cost eco-building has not yet been managed in many places. I would also suspect that if such housing was built,(supported by the banking industry) assuming it was desirable, resale profit making would bring the cost up to local market rates within a decade or so. So in my estimation the bottom line is, Cohousing, built from scratch which has private ownership of homes that are bank mortgaged will only have limited success in creating much low cost housing. The current estimate is 10% of cohousing could be called affordable. Other methods such as mortgage support, housing renovation, rentals, and such will be the means for folks on the lower end of the home ownership economic scale to find entry into cohousing. Thus cohousing is going to hold the upper economic nitch of the IC world. I would love to see a 30-60 home eco-development in Washington created with alternative technologies, strong community values, and a low cost. This is a vision of many people I have met over the years. But the realities of doing so pretty much make it impossible to accomplish. Rob Sandelin Sharingwood Cohousing, Snohomish Co, WA Where renters are welcome, and the cobb house is habitable but not yet permitable. --- Outgoing mail is certified Virus Free. Checked by AVG anti-virus system (http://www.grisoft.com). Version: 6.0.795 / Virus Database: 539 - Release Date: 11/12/2004
-
Regarding affordability... John Imbur, November 16 2004
- Re: Regarding affordability... Carol Burrell, November 16 2004
- The affordable cohousing myth vs development reality Rob Sandelin, November 16 2004
- Message not available
- Re: The affordable cohousing myth vs development reality Carol Burrell, November 16 2004
- Re: Regarding affordability... whitney beers, November 16 2004
Results generated by Tiger Technologies Web hosting using MHonArc.