Re: Population stats for villages | <– Date –> <– Thread –> |
From: Dahako (Dahako![]() |
|
Date: Thu, 2 Dec 2004 11:02:19 -0800 (PST) |
Hi again- As a side note, I lived in Eno Commons Cohousing in Durham, NC, for about 4 years (after living through a couple years of its development) and one of the interesting things to me about the size difference (22 households there versus 56 here) is that, I think the lightening of the load per household more than offsets the complications of working through consensus with a larger group. Or, in economic terms, we seem to be realizing some economies of scale. Or in colloquial terms, "many hands make light work." (Although "light" is purely a relative term - I'm pretty sure cohousing never develops easily.) There definitely has been some lessening of overall group interpersonal intensity during development. I don't think that is entirely due to the larger size of the group. . . Each household also got somewhat less say in its individual unit design, as opposed to overall building direction from the group as a whole. Jessie Handforth Kome Eastern Village Cohousing Silver Spring, Maryland "Where I'm trying to figure out where to put the grill. And the bookcases. And wondering where the calendar got to. Boxes and boxes."
- Re: Population stats for villages, (continued)
-
Re: Population stats for villages aamato, December 2 2004
- Re: Population stats for villages Racheli Gai, December 2 2004
-
Re: Population stats for villages Rachael Shapiro, December 2 2004
- Re: Population stats for villages Maggi Rohde, December 2 2004
- Re: Population stats for villages Dahako, December 2 2004
-
Re: Population stats for villages aamato, December 2 2004
-
Re: Population stats for villages DGSCCoho, December 2 2004
-
The rugged individual mark nichols, December 2 2004
- Re: The rugged individual Bonnie Fergusson, December 2 2004
-
The rugged individual mark nichols, December 2 2004
Results generated by Tiger Technologies Web hosting using MHonArc.