Re: Cohousing development slowing down? | <– Date –> <– Thread –> |
From: Sharon Villines (sharon![]() |
|
Date: Sun, 20 Feb 2005 05:46:05 -0800 (PST) |
On Feb 20, 2005, at 12:30 AM, Joani Blank wrote:
But I believe that very few cohousers got here because they were looking for an intentional community, and found this particular version of community suiting their needs. Which is why I prefer to use the term intentional neighborhood to describe cohousing.
I like the term intentional neighborhood, and agree with your point that few cohousers got where they are today because they had any interest in the intentional communities movement as they were aware of it. They would have run the other way if a cohousing group had announced a meeting to form an intentional community. But using the broader definition of community would also be to the advantage of the intentional communities movement. People want different levels of community at different stages of their lives. The intentional communities of the 1960s were heavily populated with people in their 20s. The average adult age is probably closer to 45 in cohousing. There are lots of children but the 20 somethings are off doing something else, I think.
There's going to be a big article about cohousing in the AARP magazine very soon. It is being written by Barry Yeoman, a nationally recognized and award-winning investigative journalist who is also a contributing editor to the AARP magazine. That publication goes to 3 million readers! And I expect we'll have a huge flood of inquiries after it comes out. (People who responded to the AARP newsletter article on elder cohousing a couple of months ago were probably disappointed to find that there are only two all-elder communities, one in early development, and one that isn't on The Cohousing Association's communities list so I'm not even sure that they consider themselves cohousing--as we define it).
One of the reasons the AARP audience is so ripe for cohousing is that they are looking for changes and have the freedom to pursue them. Cohousing is dependent on people who are ready to move but who can delay that move until the cohousing infrastructure is built. Even if you are doing retrofit, there is a period when there is no place to live. People typically move into cohousing from someplace else. 50+ is the age when many, many people are free to begin thinking about doing this.
That's one reason why I have encouraged forming groups to use this list to look for new members. People who are looking for a community will move to one they like. And they may be just coming home -- back to an area they once lived but jobs have taken them elsewhere.
Sharon --- Sharon Villines, Editor and PublisherBuilding Community: A Newsletter on Coops, Condos, Cohousing, and Other New Neighborhoods
http://www.buildingcommunitynews.org
-
Cohousing development slowing down? Joani Blank, February 19 2005
- Re: Cohousing development slowing down? Sharon Villines, February 20 2005
- Re: Cohousing development slowing down? Tree Bressen, February 23 2005
- Re: Cohousing development slowing down? S. Kashdan, February 21 2005
-
Re: Cohousing development slowing down? pattymara [at] juno.com, February 20 2005
- Re: Cohousing development slowing down? Chris ScottHanson, February 21 2005
Results generated by Tiger Technologies Web hosting using MHonArc.