Re: Latest on Community-wide data systems | <– Date –> <– Thread –> |
From: normangauss (normangauss![]() |
|
Date: Wed, 16 Mar 2005 09:07:28 -0800 (PST) |
We abandoned a WiFi system last December. The local Internet Service Provider (ISP) could not give us the 24/7 support that Charter Communications provides. Our system consisted of bridges, which we had to purchase, connected to each subscribers computer. These bridges converted the Ethernet cable signal on the computer to an 802.11b WiFi signal and relayed it to a single shared access point on the common house. This shared access point meant that huge downloads (computer games, movies, books) sometimes made the system unavailable to the rest of the community because there was no way to control the volume, household-by-household. Because we had various kinds of computers with various kinds of operating systems we could not take advantage of the security features that are possible with the 802.11b standard. So we had a totally unencrypted signal that anyone with a high gain antenna could read, including credit card numbers for online purchases. In addition, the bridges were constantly losing the signal because of voltage surges (many people elected to not use voltage surge protectors). Even with the protectors, the signal occasionally dropped and required recycling and rebooting. Also, the Wi-Fi signal was difficult to impossible to transmit from certain locations because of metal in the walls or metal fences. It was a royal pain to maintain. I was the trouble shooter of the system for a few months. The previous trouble shooter gave up because of the many baffling calls from distressed subscribers. I tried to fix some of them but soon found out that they were difficult to impossible to fix in a reliable way. After about two months of increasingly unhappy subscribers, we finally gave up. We are now contracting with Charter for service under a business bulk-service arrangement. They provide the cable service to each of our homes, but the company sends only one bill to the HOA. We bill our own members and collect the money, and send Charter just one check per month instead of 36 checks. So far, it has worked beautifully, but has required us to sign a 5-year contract. We hope that this 5-year contract will not cause us grief in the long run. Norm Gauss Oak Creek Commons Paso Robles, CA ----- Original Message ----- From: "Robert Heinich" <robert_heinich [at] juno.com> To: <cohousing-l [at] cohousing.org> Sent: Wednesday, March 16, 2005 6:58 AM Subject: Re: [C-L]_ Latest on Community-wide data systems > > >>> We hope to WiFi our system, since we're all located close together. > > As your hoomes are in the planning stages, why NOT planned a wired network. While WiFi is nice, wired is more reliable. WiFi is still troubled by 'problem' trees and rain. I have NOT had any difficulties with my internal wired network AND the community wireless network (maintained by me) has been fussy. > > ============================================ > Robert Heinich > Eno Commons Cohousing Neighborhood > 9 Indigo Creek Trail / Durham, NC 27712-2564 > (e) robert_heinich [at] juno.com > > > -- Joel Plotkin <joel [at] sunyit.edu> wrote: > > > Dear folks: > > I've checked the archives on community data systems (cable TV and Internet > access) and found the 1997 technical data very helpful, as well as the 2002 > information. Are there any list members who have more recent information in > this fast-moving field? > > Hundredfold Farm in Cashtown PA is a rural cohousing project with 14 planned > homes. We'd like to find a way to get our data and TV without being reliant on > the big communication companies. Does anyone have experience with community- > owned satellite access? We have heard one opinion that direct satellite links > are undesirable for Internet access because they do not come with adequate > firewalls (but this is from someone who subcontracts with the Pentagon). What > about the big dishes that were popular fifteen years ago for TV? They required > decoders, but not monthly maintenance fees. We hope to WiFi our system, since > we're all located close together. > > Reply on or off list. > Joel Plotkin > > > _________________________________________________________________ > Cohousing-L mailing list -- Unsubscribe, archives and other info at: > http://www.cohousing.org/cohousing-L/ > _________________________________________________________________ > Cohousing-L mailing list -- Unsubscribe, archives and other info at: > http://www.cohousing.org/cohousing-L/ > >
- Re: Latest on Community-wide data systems, (continued)
- Re: Latest on Community-wide data systems Matt Lawrence, March 16 2005
-
Re: Latest on Community-wide data systems Dameron Midgette, March 17 2005
- Re: Latest on Community-wide data systems normangauss, March 17 2005
-
Re: Latest on Community-wide data systems Robert Heinich, March 16 2005
- Re: Latest on Community-wide data systems normangauss, March 16 2005
- Re: Latest on Community-wide data systems Perry_rg, March 16 2005
- RE: Latest on Community-wide data systems Alexander Robin A, March 16 2005
- RE: Latest on Community-wide data systems Fred H Olson, March 17 2005
- RE: Latest on Community-wide data systems Perry_rg, March 17 2005
Results generated by Tiger Technologies Web hosting using MHonArc.