Re: Really inexpensive (ha!) cohousing?? | <– Date –> <– Thread –> |
From: sga1 (sga1![]() |
|
Date: Sun, 24 Apr 2005 18:36:59 -0700 (PDT) |
We just had our first informational meeting this afternoon about our two co-housing projects up here in Arcata and Eureka, and here are some of the ideas we presented to the group about affordable housing: -Building a two story house with only the first floor finished and the second floor roughed out for post-purchase work by a handy homeowner or pro at a later date when money is available. As long as there is a bathroom, kitchen and sleeping area a buyer can get the Certificate of Occupancy required to purchase a house, but the hard stuff (plumbing, electricity, framing) of construction has been done, while the easier stuff (drywall, painting, moulding) is left to the homeowner. -Getting limited-equity financing from the county/city. Making a house "limited equity" meets the goal of maintaining affordable housing in a community while providing funds/financing to a homeowner that make the house more affordable. -Organizing the community to deconstruct a local defunct barn or house to salvage the building materials. This was done for Marsh Commons, and each house and the Common House has salvaged old growth redwood trim from a local barn. Hope that spurs some thinking. :) Warmly, Sean Armstrong Co-housing Project Manager > > MEW > N Street Cohousing is in the lowest cost neighborhood in town. > Average houses are 1100 square feet and are poorly made. Prices have > gone up here as they have just about everywhere in CA but still are > the lowest priced in town. I believe On Going Concerns, another > retrofit community in OR is also in a low income section of town. > Retrofit cohousing in low income neighborhoods is an alternative. > Kevin > > >>So, after our wonderful most recent group amicably decided >>affordable land was just too hard to come by (alas) - my husband >>and I started joking about "Double Wide Cohousing - the affordable >>alternative!" and then I got thinking - is there any precedence for >>sacrificing aesthetics somewhat but using really inexpensive >>building techniques? Mobile home cohousing? I don't know... I'm >>not really sure if pre-fab houses are cheaper (though my sense >>from the little research I've done is that they can be really cheap in >>the "fall apart" sense, modestly priced and decent, or actually of >>pretty high quality and nice but expensive). >> >>Just curious! :-) >> >>Mary Ellen (aka "mew" - who is going to live in cohousing someday >>darnit!) ;-) >>MaryEllen Wessels / Hopeful Romantics >>mew AT mewsic DOT com >>http://www.mewsic.com >>(802) 985-3165 >> >>_________________________________________________________________ >>Cohousing-L mailing list -- Unsubscribe, archives and other info at: >>http://www.cohousing.org/cohousing-L/ > > _________________________________________________________________ > Cohousing-L mailing list -- Unsubscribe, archives and other info at: > http://www.cohousing.org/cohousing-L/ > >
-
Really inexpensive (ha!) cohousing?? Mary Ellen Wessels, April 22 2005
- Re: Really inexpensive (ha!) cohousing?? Laura Fitch, April 23 2005
-
Re: Really inexpensive (ha!) cohousing?? Kevin Wolf, April 24 2005
- Re: Really inexpensive (ha!) cohousing?? sga1, April 24 2005
Results generated by Tiger Technologies Web hosting using MHonArc.