Re: Rules & Regs | <– Date –> <– Thread –> |
From: Michael Scalia (nondue![]() |
|
Date: Wed, 3 Aug 2005 20:30:51 -0700 (PDT) |
Thanks everyone for your replies, and my apologies for double posting. I like the regulate-as-you-go approach as well, and I'm quite impresed with the slimness of the Cambridge Cohousing rules. As an EcoVillage, it's a slightly different kettle of fish, since there are two organizing principles: living in community, and being green. The bulk of the rules here are around environmental issues. My feeling is that we may have gone too far in trying to anticipate every eventuality. One of the motivators is that a new builder is coming in to put up a cluster of 25 homes. The builder does not have a history of green development, and with a tract of 25 already-built homes, this cluster may appeal to the "more typical surburban homeowner" than the "died in the wool EcoVillager" who had to sweat through the building process, getting to know her new neighbors and learning what the community is all about in the process. The folks that write the environmental guidelines (a committee of community members) are in the process of bulking up the rules & regs in anticipation of this. What I'm hearing in the forum suggests that may not be the best approach. If there is anyone out there from another enviromentally oriented community, it would be interesting to hear what your experiences are. Thanks again, Michael On 8/2/05, Marta Vanegas <admin [at] concordiacohousing.com> wrote: > Peg, > > I totally agree with you - and I'm a lawyer, supposedly making a living on > regulations. :-) I think regulate-as-you-go is a brilliant idea, besides: why > to take an advance out on the problems? > > Sincerely, Marta V. > > Peg Blum <pegb [at] cambridgecohousing.org> wrote: > After 7 years of living in community, I think our minimalist approach is > working well. When issues arise, we do try to discuss as a community and > sometimes refer problems to our Community Life Committee or our Managing > Board. One can never anticipate exactly which issues will become > problematic for your community and we believed it was best to deal with the > issues as they arose. (Not every concern needs a regulation! Sometimes it > just needs discussion at a general meeting or on email.) > _________________________________________________________________ > Cohousing-L mailing list -- Unsubscribe, archives and other info at: > http://www.cohousing.org/cohousing-L/ > > >
-
rules & regs ilyse simon, March 13 2005
-
Rules & Regs Michael Scalia, August 1 2005
-
Re: Rules & Regs Peg Blum, August 2 2005
- Re: Rules & Regs Marta Vanegas, August 2 2005
- Re: Rules & Regs Michael Scalia, August 3 2005
- Re: Rules & Regs Sharon Villines, August 4 2005
- Re: Rules & Regs Sharon Villines, August 4 2005
-
Re: Rules & Regs Peg Blum, August 2 2005
-
Rules & Regs Michael Scalia, August 1 2005
- RE: Rules & Regs Rob Sandelin, August 2 2005
Results generated by Tiger Technologies Web hosting using MHonArc.