RE: Urban/Suburban/Rural decision at start? | <– Date –> <– Thread –> |
From: Dave Ritchie (DRitchie![]() |
|
Date: Tue, 9 Aug 2005 06:43:26 -0700 (PDT) |
> My question is this - in the experience of those who have > gone down this > road before, how important is it for a cohousing group to > clarify early > where it wants to search for land (urban, suburban, rural)? Or is it > important at all? Buzz, My cohousing group had a similar split when we started looking for land. We took a map of Massachusetts with all of the towns outlined on it and had all the members mark the towns from Green for "I want to live in this town" through Red for "I will quit the project before living in this town". This got us only a very few towns that were all Green or Blue. That's where we started our land search. We had a fairly wide area where, while not everyone liked the towns, we wouldn't lose anyone if we built there. That was our backup in case we didn't find anything in our preferred towns. I suspect that if you do a similar map exercise you'll quickly find if you have some overlap to use as a starting point or if you have two "islands" such that half the group is going to be unhappy no matter where you end up. In our case the urban/rural split was not extreme: from the most urban towns being Waltham and Newton to the most rural being Bolton and Hudson. After looking unsuccessfully at a dozen sites, the bar for what is acceptable might creep a bit lower. Good luck in your search! Dave
- Re: Urban/Suburban/Rural decision at start?, (continued)
- Re: Urban/Suburban/Rural decision at start? Laura Fitch, August 10 2005
- Re: Urban/Suburban/Rural decision at start? Chris ScottHanson, August 10 2005
- Re: Urban/Suburban/Rural decision at start? Laura Fitch, August 10 2005
- Re: Urban/Suburban/Rural decision at start? Catya Belfer-Shevett, August 10 2005
Results generated by Tiger Technologies Web hosting using MHonArc.