RE: RE: Cohousing & the mainstream | <– Date –> <– Thread –> |
From: Craig Ragland (craig![]() |
|
Date: Sat, 3 Sep 2005 11:06:37 -0700 (PDT) |
Some thoughts... Another authority, Graham Meltzer, Ph.D., recently authored "Sustainable Community: Learning from the cohousing model" http://www.grahammeltzer.com/cohousing/index.htm In this interesting book, Graham studies a number of cohousing communities in different Pacific Rim countries. He uses first-hand interviews and surveys - and conducts both quantitative and qualitative analyses. Across the communities he documents, there is quite a bit of variation on many dimensions, including the levels of intentionality around environmental issues, sociality, resource sharing, etc. - some, are arguably, more mainstream than others. I think the most important "cohousing promotion" is driven by prospective cohousing communities during the pre-construction phase when the emerging community needs and seeks members. In some communities, founding (and early) members market to more "mainstream" people and seek to create more "mainstream" communities. Some groups have even panicked because not enough units had sold - they then switched to selling units through real estate agents as nice condos, with some optional community. This selected for very "mainstream" people with limited interest in the community part of the deal. Other cohousing community founders choose to adopt and promote values and practices which may be seen and labeled (today) as being more counter culture, weird, etc. (you know, like recycling was 20 years ago). This is clearly more challenging than selling something that is as similar as possible to how the prospective buyers live now. Obviously, it's simplistic to say mainstream VS values. In reality, each cohousing community makes many decisions on an ongoing basis (pre- and post-construction) which relate to how "mainstream" OUR communities will be and how they are - and how we choose to share or promote our stories. At Songaia Cohousing Community, a couple of our current members were originally challenged by our stated values and the ways we sought to live them. Initially, they saw us as being really out there. Others wanted and continue to want more practice, being concerned about whether we are walking our talk. I guess my main point is that Cohousing Communities are diverse with respect to mainstream-edness. I believe that any common promotion should recognize the diversity rather than avoid it.
-
RE: Cohousing & the mainstream Tilstra, September 3 2005
- RE: RE: Cohousing & the mainstream Craig Ragland, September 3 2005
Results generated by Tiger Technologies Web hosting using MHonArc.