Re: Mainstream vs. Cohousing (Craig Ragland) | <– Date –> <– Thread –> |
From: Marta Vanegas, Concordia Organizer (admin![]() |
|
Date: Sun, 4 Sep 2005 17:39:41 -0700 (PDT) |
Craig, You wrote: "I think the most important "cohousing promotion" is driven by prospective cohousing communities during the pre-construction phase when the emerging community needs and seeks members. In some communities, founding (and early) members market to more "mainstream" people and seek to create more "mainstream" communities. " I guess that's us. We are trying to create a suburban infill cohousing community and I'm frankly annoyed by the assumption that doing so would impair our community-ism. We will have everything that qualifies a community as cohousing. I'd still like to think that this idea could be attractive to the mainstream. Actually, we discussed this with Graham Meltzer at length, when he came to present his book in Berkeley. Graham argues in his book that cohousing is mainstream. And he concludes that as such, it offers a supportive culture and context for mainstream people to live more sustainably and healthier. I also agree with you that we should not let the cohousing concept be washed away by larger and more intensive concepts, such as Permaculture. Thanks to all participating in this discussion, I wish you well. Marta R. Vanegas Community Organizer Concordia Cohousing admin [at] concordiacohousing.org www.concordiacohousing.org "Be the change you wish to see in the world" - Mahatma Gandhi Cohousing - Building an Old Fashioned Neighborhood in a New Way
- (no other messages in thread)
Results generated by Tiger Technologies Web hosting using MHonArc.