Re: Architectural Review | <– Date –> <– Thread –> |
From: Michael Barrett (mbarrett![]() |
|
Date: Tue, 11 Oct 2005 11:44:59 -0700 (PDT) |
At Liberty Village, Maryland we have had "issues", fortunately only temporary, over exterior changes that individual residents desired. We have found that as an initial step for any proposed changes gathering and widely circulating relevant information is very helpful. To this end we have used a checklist form (below and attached) which seems to capture the needed information. This has been helpful in both informal and, where needed, more formal resolution of the issues. If it seen to be useful, please use. It is attached in both Word and Excel formats. Another point: We had problems getting volunteers for our Design Review Team when it was perceived as having a "policing" function. Now it has a specific mandate to facilitate changes - an excerpt follows: The mandate is to be positive, i.e. to try to facilitate implementation of members' wishes to enrich and improve the utility and appearance of their community surroundings, rather than negative and restrictive. The DRT will seek ways to enable a project to move forward rather than ways to stop it. The DRT will attempt to balance the desires of the individual with the wishes of the community. If friendly mutual agreement on changes, with DRT encouragement, is not forthcoming the issue can then get referred to the community business meeting for more formal resolution. This way the Design Review Team is never in the ugly position of needing to say say no. Michael Barrett http://www.libertyvillage.com Checklist from: _______________________ For: _____________________________________ Date: ________________ Description of change or addition. Sketches, dimensioned plans, elevation drawings, real or simulated pictures What is the reason for the proposal? Who will benefit? Impact on the community at large - considering young, old, handicapped or impaired? Impact on immediate neighbors - Do they agree with proposal? Impact outside the community Aesthetic: Appearance, noise & odor during construction and when complete. Traffic: effect upon vehicle, bicycle, pedestrian adult, child & animal traffic patterns. Effect of 2 to 5 years on growth, decay, utility, maintenance Initial cost: Estimate made, to be paid by? Ongoing maintenance costs: Estimate made, to be paid by? Implementation and schedule issues - who will do the work, when, are they appropriately qualified? List safety hazards, during construction and when complete. Environmental hazards to air & soil, animal & plant life, during construction and when complete. Liability: personal & community
-
1-day facilitation workshop in Oakland - Oct. 22 Tree Bressen, October 6 2005
-
Architectural Review OCC11NG, October 10 2005
- Governing & Architectural Review [was Architectural Review] Sharon Villines, October 11 2005
-
RE: Architectural Review Elana Kann, October 11 2005
- Re: Architectural Review Michael Barrett, October 11 2005
-
Architectural Review OCC11NG, October 10 2005
Results generated by Tiger Technologies Web hosting using MHonArc.