Re: Architectural review of landscaping | <– Date –> <– Thread –> |
From: Sharon Villines (sharon![]() |
|
Date: Sun, 11 Dec 2005 07:58:23 -0800 (PST) |
On Dec 10, 2005, at 11:15 PM, OCCNG11 wrote:
Our Architecture Committee is reluctant to review anything not involving structures because they claim, "architects are only concerned with structures". According to them, landscaping is not architecture.
Landscape architects specialize in landscapes they are still part of the architectural design of the complex and will affect both property values, structural integrity, and liability
Trees planted too close to the foundations can cause great damage. Other plants can obstruct sidewalks (we once had a fig tree that in one season made life hazardous). There are also issues of people planting certain kinds of plants that are hazardous to children eating the berries. Any plants on common elements or accessible from common elements should be reviewed initially and then as changes occur.
Sharon --- Sharon VillinesBuilding Community: A Newsletter on Coops, Condos, Cohousing, and Other New Neighborhoods
http://www.buildingcommunitynews.org
-
Re: Architectural review of house modifications Evdavwes, December 8 2005
-
Architectural review of landscaping OCCNG11, December 10 2005
- Re: Architectural review of landscaping John Beutler, December 11 2005
- Re: Architectural review of landscaping Sharon Villines, December 11 2005
-
Architectural review of landscaping OCCNG11, December 10 2005
Results generated by Tiger Technologies Web hosting using MHonArc.