ceiling heights (was RE: [C-L]_ very small/ compact housing) | <– Date –> <– Thread –> |
From: Jenny Williams (jlgw![]() |
|
Date: Sat, 4 Feb 2006 07:23:53 -0800 (PST) |
On a related note, I'd like people's input on ceiling height. We're desgining and building our house at Manzanita Village in Prescott, AZ, and we have been planning 8' ceilings throughout. Everyone is telling me that we'll regret it. With 8' ceilings, though, we will manage a ~6-7' high attic, which we could finish at a later date for a cozy spot. We have height restrictions for building, so we can't go above that limit. If we even change our regular floors to 9' ceilings, that changes the attic to 5-6', harder to do anything with. Do you all feel it's worth the trade off, to have higher ceilings but an unusable attic space (for anything other than plain storage)? Our house will be about 2200SF on two floors (not counting said attic). On the upper level, we will have a fairly open area for kitchen, eating area, and living room. We plan on doing ceiling height changes, with some soffits in certain areas, to break up the 8' ceiling. Ideas? I welcome all input. Thanks! jenny williams -----Original Message----- From: Hyghroad [at] aol.com [mailto:Hyghroad [at] aol.com] Sent: Saturday, February 04, 2006 6:45 AM To: cohousing-l [at] cohousing.org Subject: Re: [C-L]_ very small/ compact housing My family of four is about to move into our 1200+- sq.ft. townhouse (plus full unfinished basement) at Common Pastures in Charlotte, VT. One of the last design changes made was to get rid of a cathedral ceiling living room, to add a floor and add space on the second floor. I feel this is one of the best decisions we've made. In a small house, catherdal ceilings seem to be an unnecessary luxury, and I can just imagine all of heat that would have been trapped up there in the winter. Two other things that, in my opinion, make small houses more livable 1) lots of windows 2) vaulted ceilings on second floor. Space/storage is always an issue is small homes. For us (we are coming from an even smaller house) it has been a great incentive to reduce our consumption. Kelly Devine Common Pastures aka Champlain Valley Cohousing Charlotte, Vermont http://www.champlainvalleycohousing.org 802-425-5030 hyghroad [at] aol.com In a message dated 2/3/2006 2:58:25 PM Eastern Standard Time, pnichols [at] indigoarch.com writes: > We are family of four living in a 3-bedroom unit at Muir Commons. The > house, > at 1,170 sq ft, has some inherent space inefficiencies that bother me, like > a big u-shaped windowless stair cavity in the center of the house. It also > has some nice touches, like 10-foot ceilings in the living/ dining room. > Private garage/ utility space is non-existent. If we had some private > utility space combined with a more efficient layout, then that would > probably keep many folks here from remodeling or at least thinking about > remodeling when they could be thinking more pleasant, less expensive > thoughts. > _________________________________________________________________ Cohousing-L mailing list -- Unsubscribe, archives and other info at: http://www.cohousing.org/cohousing-L/
- RE: very small/ compact housing, (continued)
- RE: very small/ compact housing Prescott Nichols, February 3 2006
- Re: very small/ compact housing Dave and Diane, January 17 2006
- RE: very small/ compact housing stuart, January 20 2006
-
Re: very small/ compact housing Hyghroad, February 4 2006
- ceiling heights (was RE: [C-L]_ very small/ compact housing) Jenny Williams, February 4 2006
- Re: ceiling heights (was RE: [C-L]_ very small/ compact housing) Sharon Villines, February 4 2006
- RE: ceiling heights (was RE: [C-L]_ very small/ compact housing) Fleck, February 4 2006
- Re: ceiling heights (was RE: [C-L]_ very small/ compact housing) Sharon Villines, February 4 2006
- RE: ceiling heights (was RE: [C-L]_ very small/ compact housing) Jenny Williams, February 4 2006
Results generated by Tiger Technologies Web hosting using MHonArc.