Re: Re: ceiling heights | <– Date –> <– Thread –> |
From: Racheli Gai (racheli![]() |
|
Date: Mon, 6 Feb 2006 12:18:29 -0800 (PST) |
Here at Sonora Cohousing (Tucson), we chose to have 9' high ceilings in
the units which
have a second floor. (There are sloping ceilings on the second floor).Our reasoning was that adding one foot to the standard will make a significant psychological difference, in that it will make the place seem more spacious. Since cohousing homes tend to be on the small size (by American standards) - making it easier for people to live comfortably in small spaces seem like a good idea. While I had occasion to regret some
of the choices we made, this isn't one of them. R. On Feb 6, 2006, at 12:51 PM, Jenny Williams wrote:
Cooling is slightly more of an issue here than heat. But we'll also have a whole house fan, that can suck the hot air out in the evening during the summer. My only real concern is the kitchen/eating/living room portion of our house, which will be all open. I'm not sure how that would look with 8' ceilings, even with soffits strategically placed. jenny -----Original Message----- From: Prescott Nichols [mailto:pnichols [at] indigoarch.com] Sent: Monday, February 06, 2006 11:21 AM To: 'Cohousing-L' Subject: RE: [C-L]_ Re: ceiling heights James makes a good point about the economy of 8'-high ceilings. Everything in the residential construction trade fits that by default. I would hesitate to equate higher ceilings with SUVs and McMansions, however. A 10-foot ceiling permits transom windows which will bring daylight deeper into the room than lower windows. Make those transoms operable and now you can take advantage of the height to "stackventilate" the high warm air from the building at night. These qualitiesincrease the livability and energy efficiency of the home. Small rooms do fine with 8-foot ceilings, and can even seem distortedwith anything higher, but a typical cohousing living & dining space willbenefit from higher ceilings. That said, if heat loss, not cooling, is your biggest concern, then the lower ceilings might make more sense for the bigger rooms, too. Prescott -----Original Message----- From: James Kacki [mailto:jimkacki [at] mts.net] Sent: Sunday, February 05, 2006 3:08 PM To: jenny [at] holodeck.com; Cohousing-L Subject: [C-L]_ Re: ceiling heights Jenny, -8' is very standard. Building materials come in 8' lengths economically. It seems that the push for higher ceilings came about in the same way that the push for bigger cars, bigger garages, biggerhouses etc. came about; i.e. material suppliers, developers, contractorsetc. convincing people that they really need higher ceilings, bigger this, more of that, for a truly fulfilled life. As an architect, my opinion is that if you have the money and want to spend it, go for 9' ceilings or 10' ceilings if it will make you happy. However, my experience has been that 8' ceilings are perfectly fine and that spatial interplay, window/light manipulation, occasional high (even double height) spaces located for maximum effect will give you more 'bang for the buck' than an uninspired design with 9' ceilings. That's just my opinion, others may disagree, -good luck with your home design, & keep dreaming! James _________________________________________________________________ Cohousing-L mailing list -- Unsubscribe, archives and other info at: http://www.cohousing.org/cohousing-L/ _________________________________________________________________ Cohousing-L mailing list -- Unsubscribe, archives and other info at: http://www.cohousing.org/cohousing-L/
- Re: Re: ceiling heights, (continued)
- Re: Re: ceiling heights Sharon Villines, February 6 2006
- ceiling heights Molly Lazar, February 6 2006
- RE: ceiling heights Jenny Williams, February 6 2006
- Re: Re: ceiling heights Sharon Villines, February 6 2006
- Re: Re: ceiling heights Racheli Gai, February 6 2006
Results generated by Tiger Technologies Web hosting using MHonArc.