RE: kitchen design/ Social levels | <– Date –> <– Thread –> |
From: Rob Sandelin (floriferous![]() |
|
Date: Thu, 2 Mar 2006 09:50:47 -0800 (PST) |
The notion of windows in the kitchen facing out into the community comes from a variety of sources, including Alexanders, Pattern Language. The idea is to create an inside/outside social interface by connecting a place you spend a lot of indoor time to the outdoors so you can visually connect with the outside patterns. If you spend more time in a home office than the kitchen, and don't mind the interuption, then having a home office space make that connection works just fine. The goal is inside outside visual connection. Kitchen are logical choices for this connection, but not the only one. Dining spaces also can make that connection. The inside/outside connection also has a lot to do with distance between observers. The closer the outside pathway is to the inside interface the more personal the connection becomes. So for example, if I am standing at my kitchen sink looking out the window and person passes by at 6 feet, we make eye contact and have a direct connection. If that person is 14 feet or more away, then eye contact is less likely and the connection is less personal. Close quarter (8 feet or less) inside/outside connections which require individual acknowlegement with eye contact can lead to what is termed socialiablity burnout, too many connections in too short a time. So where your outside travelways are in terms of distance can influence who lives there, as well as the patterns of traffic flow. If I am a less socialable inclined person, then too many connections might cause me to withdrawl. I recall mediating in a community where a person put up kitchen curtains because they felt overwhelmed by the frequency of social contact out their window. While there was no agreement about NOT having curtains, no one else did, thus the curtains violated the social norm of the group and caused conflict. Cooperative communities, including cohousing, attract people with high tolerances for social interaction, this is often a prime draw of this type of living for those people. In cohousing it is sometimes the case that there is a difference in socialibility between spouses, with one feeling fullfilled , the other feeling overwhelmed. Making adjustments to social interaction expectations to include the range of socialibility of the group will provide your members with the best chance of fitting in and achieving their own happiness. Rob Sandelin Sharingwood Community Naturalist, Writer The Environmental Science School http://www.nonprofitpages.com/nica/SVE.htm ><((((º>`·..·`·..·`·...><((((º>...·`·..·`·...><((((º>.·`·..·`·...><((((º>.·` ·..·`·...><((((º>·.. ><((((º> ·`·..·`·...·..·`><((((º>.·`·..·`·...><((((º>.·`·..·`·...><((((º>..·`·..·`·.. .><((((º>·.. ·`·..·`·....·`·..·`·...><((((º> -- No virus found in this outgoing message. Checked by AVG Free Edition. Version: 7.1.375 / Virus Database: 268.1.1/272 - Release Date: 3/1/2006
- kitchen design, (continued)
-
kitchen design heidinys, March 2 2006
- Re: kitchen design ken, March 2 2006
-
RE: kitchen design Jenny Williams, March 2 2006
- Re: kitchen design Lenore, March 2 2006
- RE: kitchen design/ Social levels Rob Sandelin, March 2 2006
- RE: kitchen design/ Social levels Bonnie Fergusson, March 2 2006
-
kitchen design heidinys, March 2 2006
- Re: Kitchen design Dahako, December 2 2006
- Re: Kitchen design Douglas G. Larson, December 3 2006
- Re: kitchen design Judy Hecht, December 3 2006
Results generated by Tiger Technologies Web hosting using MHonArc.