Re: Trillium Hollow Pet Policy - Thanks For All The Input | <– Date –> <– Thread –> |
From: Sheryl Rapée-Adams (sheryl![]() |
|
Date: Wed, 28 Jun 2006 06:37:51 -0700 (PDT) |
Regan, I'm glad you brought this up. As cohousing residents, pets and their people are stakeholders in the human-made decisions that affect them. As an animal advocate, I have reviewed the effects of breed-specific legislation (BSL) and ordinances in different parts of the country. On one hand, lawmakers want to protect people and pets from dangerous animals. BSL is designed to alleviate the fears by communities traumatized by vicious animal attacks. Inevitably, however, BSL fails in its intent to protect people and their animal companions from dog attacks. Worse, community members may become complacent and ignore the real issues, erroneously feeling that the dangerous dogs have been eliminated with the banning of certain breeds. Much more promising (and many already successful) ordinances do two things: 1) Place full financial and criminal liability _on the animals' owners_ for animal attacks; and 2) Approach the dogs themselves from a "blame the deed, not the breed" perspective. In other words, regardless of breed, individual dogs whose behavior proves threatening/dangerous are subject to being banned or put to death. Breed-specific legislation is increasingly being rejected as lawmakers understand the futility. Here are some references: http://network.bestfriends.org/News/PostDetail.aspx?np=1971&g=dc17caba-4f8f- 471c-b5df-d7fc2d477fca http://network.bestfriends.org/News/PostDetail.aspx?np=2143&g=930040ae-b8f9- 4ada-a514-ab4fd2f0f250 In October, Best Friends Animal Society will hold a conference in Denver to educate people about effective ways to protect communities from dangerous animals and to advocate for pit bulls, likely the most abused breed today. Wouldn't it be awesome of cohousing, already the cultural progressive leading edge in so many ways, embraced the most progressive and effective solutions in this area as well? /\ /\ = ` ` = Sheryl Vermont Community Editor, Best Friends Network http://network.bestfriends.org -----Original Message----- From: Regan Conley [mailto:reganconley [at] earthlink.net] Sent: Wednesday, June 28, 2006 8:14 AM To: Cohousing-L Subject: Re: [C-L]_ Trillium Hollow Pet Policy - Thanks For All The Input And why the detailed listing of certain dog breeds? And how would you enforce this outside of an AKC certificate? I know that some municipalities have out-lawed certain breeds in an attempt to deal with drug commerce problems, but well-trained dogs are well-trained dogs, regardless of breed. Regan -- No virus found in this outgoing message. Checked by AVG Free Edition. Version: 7.1.394 / Virus Database: 268.9.5/377 - Release Date: 6/27/2006
-
Trillium Hollow Pet Policy - Thanks For All The Input Charles Maclean, June 27 2006
-
Re: Trillium Hollow Pet Policy - Thanks For All The Input Sharon Villines, June 28 2006
- Re: Trillium Hollow Pet Policy - Thanks For All The Input Trudy Reeves, June 28 2006
-
Re: Trillium Hollow Pet Policy - Thanks For All The Input Regan Conley, June 28 2006
- Re: Trillium Hollow Pet Policy - Thanks For All The Input Sheryl Rapée-Adams, June 28 2006
- Re: Trillium Hollow Pet Policy - Thanks For All The Input Alexander Robin A, June 29 2006
-
Re: Trillium Hollow Pet Policy - Thanks For All The Input Sharon Villines, June 28 2006
- Re: Trillium Hollow Pet Policy - Thanks For All The Input Nancy Baumeister, July 3 2006
-
Re: Trillium Hollow Pet Policy - Thanks For All The Input Fred H Olson, June 30 2006
- Re: Trillium Hollow Pet Policy - Thanks For All The Input Raines Cohen, July 1 2006
Results generated by Tiger Technologies Web hosting using MHonArc.