Re: Common house permitting and Cities | <– Date –> <– Thread –> |
From: Herveys (hervey![]() |
|
Date: Sun, 17 Sep 2006 09:37:19 -0700 (PDT) |
One issue that hasn't come up in this discussion of ADA specified requirements is that, like all legislation, ADA is rife with compromises. One we encountered while attempting to design our Common House kitchen to be inviting for all was the specified counter height. Standard counter height is something like 36". ADA was either 34 or 32", I don't remember. When we asked members and friends who "live" in wheel chairs, they said that 30" was much more workable. We tried sitting in chairs and found that 29" was even better for folks who aren't yet wheel chair bound, but would rather sit that stand, (or half stand on a stool). (We designed a two height cutting table to provide both 36" and 30" places to work.) Another item to watch out for is the terminology you use. We wanted the downstairs of all units to be "visitable" and wanted downstairs bathrooms to be at least "adaptable". Our architect took that to mean that we wanted all downstairs bathrooms to be ADA. In my opinon, this resulted in lots of wasted space in 10 of our units. (One of our members with 3 kids in wheel chairs approved of several different designs, that saved much space - but the architect claimed large redesign costs would need to be levied and that we had agreed to ADA. Which technically we had, but it had not been the intent we expressed. She just translated our intent to her terminology and we didn't understand the implications.) Richard Hervey Ever wish you could live next door to your best friends? <http://www.cohousing-corvallis.com/index.shtml>
-
Re: common house permitting and Cities Lynn Nadeau, September 13 2006
- Re: Common house permitting and Cities Herveys, September 17 2006
-
Re: Common house permitting and Cities Larry Moss, September 17 2006
- Re: Common house permitting and Cities Sharon Villines, September 18 2006
Results generated by Tiger Technologies Web hosting using MHonArc.