Re: Dangers of Fluorescent lighting (was New Bulbs) | <– Date –> <– Thread –> |
From: Saramandaia Farm (etaincr![]() |
|
Date: Fri, 2 Feb 2007 22:54:47 -0800 (PST) |
Nathan, I found that article to be almost incoherent, full of anecdotal references and the old "toxic substances in the body" buzz words. Some of the work cited went back to the 50s. There were references to autistic people in 1976. Then there are the old "poisoned by mercury fillings" allusions. I can't make any sense out of the mention of the 1952 findings by Zaccaria and Bitterman. I think the article is poor and the premise unproven. Sharon --------------------------------- Don't be flakey. Get Yahoo! Mail for Mobile and always stay connected to friends.
- Re: New Bulbs, (continued)
- Re: New Bulbs Andrew Netherton, February 2 2007
- Re: Dangers of Fluorescent lighting (was New Bulbs) nathan schomber, February 2 2007
- Re: Dangers of Fluorescent lighting (was New Bulbs) Saramandaia Farm, February 2 2007
- Re: Dangers of Fluorescent lighting (was New Bulbs) nathan schomber, February 2 2007
- Re: Dangers of Fluorescent lighting (was New Bulbs) Saramandaia Farm, February 2 2007
Results generated by Tiger Technologies Web hosting using MHonArc.