Re: principle vs preference / Formal Consensus | <– Date –> <– Thread –> |
From: John Beutler (jbeutler![]() |
|
Date: Sun, 18 Mar 2007 18:53:31 -0700 (PDT) |
Yes, at Liberty Village, we had a block that didn't go away until the
blocking partner was bought out of the development partnership. Laird
Schaub spent several meetings trying to help us work it through, but it
finally came down to a fairly expensive settlement involving lawyers and a
lot of time, but at least no lawsuit. Once that happened, the proposal
passed easily.
At 12:52 PM 3/18/2007 -0700, Lynn Nadeau wrote:
If a person themself set aside their dissent, realizing it wasn't about principle, that would work. But to have a block invalidated by the rest of the group? Kind of like "consensus minus one" - I find it hard to imagine that the dissenter would still feel part of the group, and could see that being a prelude to losing a member. Anyone have experience of that juncture? Lynn at RoseWind Port Townsend WA
JAB John Beutler Liberty Village, MD jbeutler [at] adelphia.nethttp://www.libertyvillage.com/
-
principle vs preference / Formal Consensus Lynn Nadeau, March 18 2007
- Re: principle vs preference / Formal Consensus John Beutler, March 18 2007
- Re: principle vs preference / Formal Consensus Sharon Villines, March 19 2007
-
Re: principle vs preference / Formal Consensus Tree Bressen, March 29 2007
-
Objections in Consensus [was: principle vs preference / Formal Consensus Sharon Villines, March 29 2007
- Re: Objections in Consensus [was: principle vs preference / Formal Consensus Rosemary Gould, March 29 2007
-
Objections in Consensus [was: principle vs preference / Formal Consensus Sharon Villines, March 29 2007
Results generated by Tiger Technologies Web hosting using MHonArc.