Cohousing-L Mailing List: Re: attached vs detached

[em_genuity (em_genuity]

I apologize for assuming the burbs. 
Sent from my BlackBerry® wireless device

-----Original Message-----
From: James Kacki <jimkacki [at] mts.net>

Date: Wed, 04 Jul 2007 15:02:42 
To:Cohousing-L <cohousing-l [at] cohousing.org>
Subject: Re: [C-L]_ attached vs detached


I was eliciting comparisons between attached coho apt. type housing with
detached 'village style coho, NOT coho vs suburban isolation, as your 
note seems to suggest.
James

em_genuity [at] yahoo.com wrote:
 > Hello, I have never blogged' and don't live in co-housing, but am
 > interested in it. But my thought is, if you are choosing co ho, you
 > probably have to be okay with honestly facing interpersonal conflict,
 > even if you don't know the neighbors all that well, the housing jusy
 > seems set up for More real life encounters, for better or worse, so
 > to speak. Is that most co ho's experience, that it can be more messy
 > but if you face it it's much more rewarding than suburban isolation!?
 >
 >
 > Thanks,
 >
 > e.e.
 >
 > On Jul 2, 2007, at 2:07 PM, James Kacki wrote:
 >
 >
 >> Does being so close cause interpersonal or societal conflicts that
 >> might not arise in detached housing.  (I understand the green
 >> (environmental) and energy advantages of single building
 >> construction, but this question is about the interpersonal
 >> implications). Anyone in that type of co-housing care to comment?
 >
 >
 >
 >
 >
 >
 > _________________________________________________________________
 > Cohousing-L mailing list -- Unsubscribe, archives and other info at:
 >  http://www.cohousing.org/cohousing-L/
 >
 >
 > _________________________________________________________________
 > Cohousing-L mailing list -- Unsubscribe, archives and other info at:
 >  http://www.cohousing.org/cohousing-L/
 >
 >

_________________________________________________________________
Cohousing-L mailing list -- Unsubscribe, archives and other info at: 
http://www.cohousing.org/cohousing-L/