Re: Voting backup - help with fine print | <– Date –> <– Thread –> |
From: John Faust (wjfaust![]() |
|
Date: Mon, 28 Jan 2008 19:24:28 -0800 (PST) |
Something a little more flexible might be to have a decision date associated with each proposal. If the date is unreasonable for the proposal, the proposal shouldn't be accepted for consideration. The only reason I can think of an inappropriate date is a conflict between a personal and community agenda. If it is a reasonable date, it determines when a fall back voting process will be applied. This should accommodate both internally and externally-imposed deadlines--longer deadlines for important internal issues and shorter deadlines for externally-generated issues. Perhaps with fall back voting, blockers should be allowed to convene additional meetings where an urgent date would not allow more than one normally-scheduled meetings. John Faust
-
Voting backup - help with fine print Jenny Guy, January 28 2008
-
Re: Voting backup - help with fine print Cathy Angell, January 28 2008
- Re: Voting backup - help with fine print John Faust, January 28 2008
-
Re: Voting backup - help with fine print Cathy Angell, January 28 2008
-
Re: Voting backup - help with fine print Sharon Villines, January 30 2008
- Re: Voting backup - help with fine print Catya Belfer-Shevett, January 30 2008
-
Re: Voting backup - help with fine print Diana Kardia, January 31 2008
- Re: Voting backup - help with fine print Sharon Villines, February 1 2008
Results generated by Tiger Technologies Web hosting using MHonArc.