Re: [C-L] Demographics and diversity (or lackthereof) | <– Date –> <– Thread –> |
From: Racheli Gai (racheli![]() |
|
Date: Mon, 11 Feb 2008 13:49:58 -0800 (PST) |
I don't think there is one way to do cohousing "right". Cohousing
communities don't have to be
diverse to be "real", or to provide their members with meaningful and
satisfactory lives,
but wishing to have diversity isn't wrong, either.For communities who wish to have younger people (and children!) - I think that unless special efforts are made to attract them, they might not join. And as Larry pointed out - economic and other factors might intervene. Other things being equal, though, I still think that people with children often wish to join communities that have kids for the owns' to play with. Thinking back on our joining - it seems to me that our kids would have objected strenuously if we attempted to join a community with no (or almost no) children. It's also the case that we didn't plan to have more kids, but love having other people's kids around: Cohousing seemed to answer this need *for us*. This isn't to say that everyone has (or should have) identical needs. I think it's great to have communities (coho or other) with lots of variations and different flavors.
On the level of "vibes", I'm sensing so much tension around this issue...
Racheli. On Feb 11, 2008, at 1:43 PM, Larry Miller wrote:
"it's just that the field seems for some reason to attract more women, and in the case of ourgroup, more people between 50 and 70. "Oak Creek Commons has a similar demographic. Out of 35 occupied homes, we have 18 single women,3 single men, and 14 couples. Over half the adults are over 60.In our case and, I suspect, in many cohousing communities, this is likely to be common for some basic reasons. We are located in a small town (25,000) in a primarily agricultural area. Jobs, especially high paying ones, are hard to come by. Nevertheless, real estate is relatively expensive here. Most of our community moved here from the LA or San Francisco Bay areas, where pay was higher, jobs more plentiful, and real estate even more expensive. Thus, our community was most appealing to those who had some money or previously owned a home, and did not need to find local employment. As a result, our population has a high percentage of retirees and those whose jobs can be done from the home, which also seems to be predominately older folks.We did attempt to encourage a particular demographic, namely families with children, when homes came up for resale. The effort has not been successful, as other factors, at least in our area,drive the real estate market more than what we can do to influence it. Larry Miller Oak Creek Commons _________________________________________________________________ Cohousing-L mailing list -- Unsubscribe, archives and other info at: http://www.cohousing.org/cohousing-L/
- Re: when all our men are dead and gone, (continued)
- Re: when all our men are dead and gone Dimitri Galitzine, February 11 2008
-
Re: when all our men are dead and gone Tom Hammer, February 11 2008
-
Re: when all our men are dead and gone melanie griffin, February 11 2008
- Re: when all our men are dead and gone Larry Miller, February 11 2008
- Re: [C-L] Demographics and diversity (or lackthereof) Racheli Gai, February 11 2008
-
Re: when all our men are dead and gone melanie griffin, February 11 2008
- Message not available
- Re: when all our men are dead and gone Muriel Kranowski, February 11 2008
- Elders and cohousing and kids Rob Sandelin, February 11 2008
- InterGenerational Cohousing [ was when all the men die (or something like that)] Sharon Villines, February 11 2008
- Re: when all our men are dead and gone Kay Argyle, February 12 2008
Results generated by Tiger Technologies Web hosting using MHonArc.