Re: Okay! we're moving the conf call to 7:00 Monday's | <– Date –> <– Thread –> |
From: Beverly Bocaner (mediaworks1704![]() |
|
Date: Mon, 25 Feb 2008 09:31:28 -0800 (PST) |
At the risk of going beyond the realm of these discussions, I submit: I've been interested in Co-Housing since ordering a handbook on the subject for our library and making extensive notes during checkout. I set the interest aside until my Mother's death; she lived with me, as her primary caregiver, during Alzheimer's. The success and importance of that experience powerfully underscored my need to maintain independence yet achieve community during my own aging process. I've picked up Co-Housing again, as a matter for serious exploration. I own a Victorian duplex, built 1889 and converted to up/down apartments after the silver crash of 1893. The property's located between two parks, near the Botanic Gardens, close to excellent public transportation, and adjacent on the West side to six other Victorians built the same year, some really big! Zoning in my block includes both R-4 (business) and Historic District, meaning old homes are protected against thoughtless scraping, but type of use is broadly defined. The east side of the block includes multi-family apartments, condos, and one educational enterprise, with each property having undergone extensive updating. The West Side remains a hodge-podge of variously owned Victorians in a variety of conditions. Land values almost preclude rehab investment and owners will recover their initial investment without making any effort to improve. A large and new day shelter for women and children is built near the SW corner, near a gas station on Colfax, a Main Street in Denver. I've steadily refinanced for improvements since 1988 but I'm far from finished: recent roof and HVAC; flagstone patio and walkways; zeric landscape in progress; interesting and attractive two-car garage; two parking spaces in the rear; have rental income from the first floor apartment; engineering complete for a deck off the second floor kitchen. I consider all seven Victorians absolutely right for a Retrofit Co-housing Community, tho requiring wads of time and cash to retrieve them all from obscurity and decline. Since "you can't take it with you," anyone familiar with donating equity/tools/good furniture to an enterprise designed to create community? Share resources and skills, prepared to invest for eco-friendly, quality green construction when needed, and careful design of private and communal space? What about creating one CoHouse (as a prototype) by my offering an owner carry-back (on the first floor apartment as condo) with no down payment, a low-interest 15 year loan, and my donation of equity, etc., when legally sane to do so? This would be a sure-fire investment for eventual owners who need the security of a market-rate exit strategy to protect their investment. My place could be the start of something big, something cool, and sorely needed as an alternative to business as usual. Comments or advice anyone?
- Re: Okay! we're moving the conf call to 7:00 Monday's, (continued)
-
Re: Okay! we're moving the conf call to 7:00 Monday's Sarah Francis, February 19 2008
- Re: Okay! we're moving the conf call to 7:00 Monday's carrol crawford, February 19 2008
- Re: Okay! we're moving the conf call to 7:00 Monday's Doug Chamberlin, February 19 2008
-
Re: Okay! we're moving the conf call to 7:00 Monday's rainesc, February 19 2008
- Re: Okay! we're moving the conf call to 7:00 Monday's Beverly Bocaner, February 25 2008
- Re: Okay! we're moving the conf call to 7:00 Monday's Sarah Francis, February 19 2008
-
Re: Okay! we're moving the conf call to 7:00 Monday's Sarah Francis, February 19 2008
Results generated by Tiger Technologies Web hosting using MHonArc.