Re: Elevators and exclusions | <– Date –> <– Thread –> |
From: Randy Sailer (randy.sailer![]() |
|
Date: Mon, 12 May 2008 06:31:59 -0700 (PDT) |
Didn't want to quote the entire post, but I wanted to support what Tim
has to say about this and the way he said it.
Thank you Tim!! Randy Sailer Rocky Hill Cohousing On May 11, 2008, at 10:32 PM, cohousing-l-request [at] cohousing.org wrote:
Date: Sun, 11 May 2008 16:06:50 -0600 From: Tim Mensch <tim-coho-l [at] bitgems.com> Subject: Re: [C-L]_ Elevators and exclusions To: Cohousing-L <cohousing-l [at] cohousing.org> Message-ID: <48276DFA.30602 [at] bitgems.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowedI've been staying out of the elevator debate for an important reason: Idon't feel strongly about either side. I support folks who value accessibility more than affordability, and I support folks who value affordability more than accessibility.
- accessibility, privilege, survey, dialogue and other misc. thoughts, (continued)
- accessibility, privilege, survey, dialogue and other misc. thoughts laura, May 9 2008
- Re: Elevators and exclusions Brian Bartholomew, May 10 2008
- Privilege (was Re: Elevators and exclusions) Catya Belfer-Shevett, May 10 2008
- Re: Elevators and exclusions melanie griffin, May 10 2008
- Re: Elevators and exclusions Randy Sailer, May 12 2008
- Re: Elevators and exclusions Randy Sailer, May 20 2008
-
Re: Elevators and exclusions David Heimann, May 20 2008
- Re: Elevators and exclusions Ann Zabaldo, May 21 2008
Results generated by Tiger Technologies Web hosting using MHonArc.