Cohousing as Community vs. Investment | <– Date –> <– Thread –> |
From: E L Cobb (a_momcat![]() |
|
Date: Thu, 15 May 2008 20:48:56 -0700 (PDT) |
Having found John's and Brian's posts to be quite civil and raising very valid questions, I am surprised at the energy level of some of the responses. Could it be that the questions are hitting too close to home? I unsubscribed from this list back in 2004 after a similar flurry of emotions. The topic was on subsidizing lower-income families so that they too could participate in cohousing. One person said that s/he didn't care to use her hard-earned money subsidizing lazy people -- that this was *America* and anyone who was willing to work hard enough could succeed, just as s/he did! As if everyone in this country was born onto a level playing field. After my initial excitement over the cohousing philosophy, I decided that cohousing was just another form of gated community, to keep the have-nots out of the neighborhood while sounding like a wonderful movement concerned with diversity, sustainability, community, and true love of and concern for the environment. And then I discovered a new group forming outside of Ithaca who really seem to live the cohousing philosophy, who don't just talk the talk but walk the walk. So I resubscribed. I hasten to add, before people pounce on me, that I am sure that there are other communities out in cohousing land who also walk the walk; who are more concerned with inclusivity than they are about the value of their property going down; and I hope that one day these communities will be the rule rather than the exception. Liza Looking for a place to call home
- (no other messages in thread)
Results generated by Tiger Technologies Web hosting using MHonArc.