| Re: Work or Pay Systems | <– Date –> <– Thread –> |
|
From: Brian Bartholomew (bb |
|
| Date: Thu, 31 Jul 2008 23:06:37 -0700 (PDT) | |
> while markets (talking classical economics here), to function well
> assume buyers and sellers do not know each other over time (because
> familiarity breeds preferences, and other sorts of"inefficiencies"
> in pricing mechanisms).
Wait a minute. That would seem to suggest that everyone participates
in those Nigerian money transfer schemes they get as spam. The terms
are fantastic, and the parties know nothing about each other.
> communities are predicated on long-term relationships (what happens
> when people expect to know each other over time)
The game theories have the "nicest" results when all parties believe
the game will go on forever. I buy certain brands at the grocery
because I have a history of satisfaction with those brands. I'm not
saying I have a human social relationship with Nabisco, but they have
given me reason to believe their next box of crackers will taste as I
expect. That familiarity and those preferences produce efficiency
while shopping.
Brian
- Re: Work or Pay Systems, (continued)
- Re: Work or Pay Systems Tim Mensch, July 31 2008
- Re: Work or Pay Systems Joanie Connors, July 31 2008
- Re: Work or Pay Systems Racheli Gai, July 31 2008
- Re: Work or Pay Systems Raines Cohen, July 31 2008
- Re: Work or Pay Systems Brian Bartholomew, July 31 2008
- Re: Work or Pay Systems Sharon Villines, August 1 2008
- Re: Work or Pay Systems Tim Mensch, August 1 2008
- Re: Work or Pay Systems Brian Bartholomew, August 3 2008
- Re: Work or Pay Systems Sharon Villines, August 3 2008
Results generated by Tiger Technologies Web hosting using MHonArc.