Re: Cohousing Developers | <– Date –> <– Thread –> |
From: katie-henry (katie-henry![]() |
|
Date: Wed, 13 Aug 2008 12:15:37 -0700 (PDT) |
Sarah from the UK wrote me directly since I'm the EVC contact on the FIC site. (And I still haven't responded. Sorry, Sarah.) So I will take the liberty of clarifying her question. They are trying to determine the pros and cons of the following two approaches: (1) The "conventional" model, where a group forms and then partners with a developer to find a site and build a building, with some amount of financial participation and risk from the group members, vs. (2) The "developer-driven" model, where a developer finds and acquires a site that seems suitable for cohousing, then organizes the group around the site and gets the group members involved in design and community-building from the beginning. The developer puts up most of the money and takes most of the risk. In cohousing developer circles, this is also called the Don Tucker model (he's the developer in Eco Housing, and he's the only one to do it on a large scale, and more than once). There was a lot of discussion about this a few months ago. Katie Eastern Village Cohousing Silver Spring, MD
- Re: Cohousing Developers, (continued)
-
Re: Cohousing Developers Ann Zabaldo, August 13 2008
- Re: Cohousing Developers Craig Ragland, August 13 2008
-
Re: Cohousing Developers Kristen Simmons, August 13 2008
- Re: Cohousing Developers Craig Ragland, August 13 2008
- Re: Cohousing Developers katie-henry, August 13 2008
-
Re: Cohousing Developers Ann Zabaldo, August 13 2008
Results generated by Tiger Technologies Web hosting using MHonArc.