Re: Exclusion of a Member (Louis-H. Campagna) | <– Date –> <– Thread –> |
From: Leah (drsweetie![]() |
|
Date: Tue, 21 Oct 2008 09:57:24 -0700 (PDT) |
We had a participant early in development that had some challenges regarding communication skills and ability to follow our process. Not wanting to be exclusionary, we welcomed him into our group and he attended meetings for quite a few months without forming significant relationships or meeting the specific outlined steps for becoming an associate or equity member. It became an issue when we realized there were other members that had been attending meetings for a shorter period of time that would be "competing" with him for a unit. We had a meeting of equity members that was fairly stressful for many of us in which we agonized over the idea of not wanting to exclude anyone versus not really wanting this person to be part of our community. A few people remarked that they would be OK with him being in the community but they wouldn't actually hang out with the guy. Finally a decision was made to tell him that it wasn't going to work, and someone in our group was nice enough to volunteer for that unattractive task. He did not take it well. He also had a disability and decided that this was the reason we had made the decision, and immediately started calling members and telling them that he was going to the newspapers, government agencies, etc. to report us. We had another meeting to strategize about this, but his "reports" didn't get much attention in the end and it finally died down. In the end, I think people left with the feeling that we should have been clear about it early on, but I am not sure that would be possible. While it was obvious from the start that things were likely to go atypically with this individual, we did not have enough information about his ability to be part of our community until some time had passed. --- On Tue, 10/21/08, cohousing-l-request [at] cohousing.org <cohousing-l-request [at] cohousing.org> wrote: From: cohousing-l-request [at] cohousing.org <cohousing-l-request [at] cohousing.org> Subject: Cohousing-L Digest, Vol 57, Issue 25 To: cohousing-l [at] cohousing.org Date: Tuesday, October 21, 2008, 3:16 AM Send Cohousing-L mailing list submissions to cohousing-l [at] cohousing.org To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit http://lists.cohousing.org/mailman/listinfo/cohousing-l or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to cohousing-l-request [at] cohousing.org You can reach the person managing the list at cohousing-l-owner [at] cohousing.org When replying, please edit your Subject line so it is more specific than "Re: Contents of Cohousing-L digest..." Today's Topics: 1. Exclusion of a Member (Louis-H. Campagna) 2. Re: Exclusion of a Member (Rob Sandelin) ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Message: 1 Date: Sun, 19 Oct 2008 15:50:18 +0000 From: "Louis-H. Campagna" <lhcampagna [at] hotmail.com> Subject: [C-L]_ Exclusion of a Member To: "cohousing-l [at] cohousing.org" <cohousing-l [at] cohousing.org> Message-ID: <BLU107-W58A4CC33441BEE0CA134B3DD2C0 [at] phx.gbl> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Hi, I'd like to hear your experiences around the issue of excluding (banning) a member of a project group, or of an established cohousing if applicable. What happened ? What were the issues ? How did the group handle the situation ? What method was used ? Was it done fairly ? Did it involve internal procedures, legal suits, etc. ? Was the end result (departure of a member) satisfactory ? Did it resolve the group's problem ? Was exclusion the necessary solution to improve the group's dynamic ? All contributions welcome. Regards, Louis-H. Campagna Cohabitat Qu?bec--Coop?rative d'accession ? la propri?t? Quebec City QC Canada _________________________________________________________________ ------------------------------ Message: 2 Date: Mon, 20 Oct 2008 08:00:10 -0700 From: "Rob Sandelin" <floriferous [at] msn.com> Subject: Re: [C-L]_ Exclusion of a Member To: "'Cohousing-L'" <cohousing-l [at] cohousing.org> Message-ID: <BLU0-SMTP15B2471004190CBFE4FA03A32F0 [at] phx.gbl> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Once upon a time I got called in to a community to facilitate the process of either reconciling with or helping the group remove a member who was seen by the group as being far out of sync with everybody else to the point where people did not to be around or work with this person. I approached it as a sharing circle of feelings, holding a very tight facilitators grip on HOW people communicated their feelings in order to allow for the most constructive feedback. To everyone's surprise, including mine, the person in question was stunned that he had alienated so many people by how he communicated. It was the FIRST time in his whole life anybody had ever given him such feedback and he was open enough to realize that some of other failed relationships in life were due to how he communicated. His angry and confrontational style served him in his business life, but ruined his social relationships. When I left, the group had made an agreement to make him provisional based upon behavioral and communicational improvements. About 4 years later I ran into somebody from that group and I asked about "Bill" (Not his real name) and I heard that Bill had become a core member and was loved by everybody. This particular group was willing to invest a lot of time and energy (and money to hire me) to preserve and continue a relationship to a single member. Of course this outcome is perhaps not common and in such cases, the disaffected person leaves. But the lesson I learned from that experience is that a good system of direct and honest nonjudgmental feedback can help a great deal to improve damaged relationships. Rob Sandelin Sharingwood Community Snohomish County, WA ------------------------------ _________________________________________________________________ Cohousing-L mailing list -- Unsubscribe, archives and other info at: http://www.cohousing.org/cohousing-L/ End of Cohousing-L Digest, Vol 57, Issue 25 *******************************************
- (no other messages in thread)
Results generated by Tiger Technologies Web hosting using MHonArc.