Re: Excluding a member | <– Date –> <– Thread –> |
From: Sharon Villines (sharon![]() |
|
Date: Wed, 22 Oct 2008 10:45:49 -0700 (PDT) |
On Oct 22, 2008, at 12:43 PM, R.N. Johnson wrote:
We made a decision to add to our bylaws a clause that allowed us to exclude someone if 80% of the group agreed that their inclusion would likely prevent us from successful development.
This example is a good one for determining when and how to begin making decisions by consensus. In sociocratic organizations, one of the conditions for effective consensus decision-making is that all the group members agree to make decisions together.
Gerard Endenburg has questioned whether consensus can be effective in cohousing where people cannot choose with whom to make decisions. Not only is there no ultimate control over who moves in but a resident can partner up with someone who is offensive or out of step with the rest of the group.
Consensus works well most of the time in any group because there is an obvious solution or everyone, in that instance, shares a common aim, but when there is no best or even clearly good enough solution or people do not have a common aim, trying to use consensus can be self- defeating.
It has generally been the assumption that the forming stage is the practice ground for consensus decision-making and you have to use it from the beginning or not use it at all. I think this example and others bring this into question.
They are also good examples of a frank and caring discussion being effective. I once had a student in an independent study course who kept missing appointments and when he did show up hadn't been able to accomplish his work. But he had been referred by a colleague in another department and I didn't want to look like a failure.
With fear and trepidation, I finally said to the student that independent study might not be the best for him. He was so relieved. He hadn't wanted to do it in the first place but felt obligated to follow through.
Sometimes people just don't know how to withdraw. If they are having problems adjusting to the group, they may also be having problems disengaging.
Sharon Villines Save Our Planet; it's the only one with chocolate.
-
Re: Excluding a member R.N. Johnson, October 22 2008
- Re: Excluding a member Sharon Villines, October 22 2008
- Unreasonable members tying up decision making Rob Sandelin, October 22 2008
-
Common house reservations Catya Belfer-Shevett, October 30 2008
- Re: Common house reservations Larry Miller, October 30 2008
- Re: Common house reservations Bonnie Fergusson, October 30 2008
Results generated by Tiger Technologies Web hosting using MHonArc.