Re: qualifying a block as legitimate | <– Date –> <– Thread –> |
From: Rob Sandelin (floriferous![]() |
|
Date: Mon, 6 Apr 2009 19:13:50 -0700 (PDT) |
At Sharingwood we have a three attempts at consensus then majority vote option. We have only actually used this option once in a decade. Knowing that you need to compromise or eventually get outvoted moves things and generally we are able to get permission for most things once they are modified. Notice I said permission, not agreement. In our process Consensus is giving permission for the group to go ahead, even if you disagree. When we seek permission usually we ask something like, if you can give permission to move ahead with this proposal as it stands show one finger, if you have questions, issues or concerns, show two fingers. Then we process the two fingers and almost always come up with modifications that work. However, sometimes the answer to a proposal is no, not necessarily from one person, but from many. In this case the proposal is either highly modified or abandoned. We have no process really of blocking, just modifying. Sometimes people get confused about applying their personal values to everyone, and usually this gets pointed out, which usually resolves it, since it is implied and understood that it is not reasonable to hold everybody hostage to your values. As I think back, I can not really remember the last good controversy we had which did not get worked out. Rob Sandelin Sharingwood Cohousing Former Consensus facilitation trainer -----Original Message----- From: Muriel Kranowski [mailto:murielk [at] vt.edu] Sent: Monday, April 06, 2009 6:36 PM To: cohousing-l [at] cohousing.org Subject: [C-L]_ qualifying a block as legitimate This is a topic we are now discussing. Do any communities require an announced consensus block to be judged to be valid or legitimate before allowing it to stand? I'd be very interested to see anything in your bylaws or policies about this, or just a description of how you do this kind of assessing. Specifically: - how do you go about making the decision that the block is/is not legitimate, ie, what steps are followed and what are your criteria? - how does this work out for you in practice, and are you fairly satisfied with how it works for your community? - do you have an over-ride process to deal with a block, or does a block truly block a proposal? I'm assuming you have followed good consensus process, have talked at sufficient length and respectfully with the blocker, and the person won't withdraw the proposed block, so you have to deal with it. Thanks! Muriel Kranowski Shadowlake Village Cohousing Blacksburg, VA _________________________________________________________________ Cohousing-L mailing list -- Unsubscribe, archives and other info at: http://www.cohousing.org/cohousing-L/
-
qualifying a block as legitimate Muriel Kranowski, April 6 2009
- Re: qualifying a block as legitimate John Faust, April 6 2009
- Re: qualifying a block as legitimate Rob Sandelin, April 6 2009
- Re: qualifying a block as legitimate Sharon Villines, April 6 2009
-
Re: qualifying a block as legitimate Rod Lambert, April 7 2009
-
Re: qualifying a block as legitimate Lyle Scheer, April 7 2009
- Re: qualifying a block as legitimate Ann Zabaldo, April 7 2009
-
Re: qualifying a block as legitimate Lyle Scheer, April 7 2009
Results generated by Tiger Technologies Web hosting using MHonArc.