Re: Forthcoming Book: The Art Of Community | <– Date –> <– Thread –> |
From: Brian Bartholomew (bb![]() |
|
Date: Mon, 27 Apr 2009 18:57:11 -0700 (PDT) |
| The next most fundamental difference is that the political system of | open source software development is nonexistent -- it is an anarchy -- | there is no politics or government. > Sounds like cohousing to me! Not to me. When I looked into this a couple years back, it seemed that nearly all cohos had a legally binding, enforced-by-the-courts- and-police, majority vote in their bylaws to make the lenders happy. In some places this consciously affects the "consensus" decisions; as Rob Sandelin said: "Knowing that you need to compromise or eventually get outvoted moves things and generally we are able to get permission for most things once they are modified." That's politics! Whereas, in open source land, there is no force, so there is no politics. Conflict may remain unresolved forever, and developers aren't blocked from doing their own thing. Open source software operates on a very pure (and very rude and noisy) form of consensus. Brian
- Re: Forthcoming Book: The Art Of Community, (continued)
-
Re: Forthcoming Book: The Art Of Community Brian Bartholomew, April 27 2009
-
Re: Forthcoming Book: The Art Of Community Craig Ragland, April 27 2009
- Re: Forthcoming Book: The Art Of Community Brian Bartholomew, April 27 2009
- Re: Forthcoming Book: The Art Of Community Sharon Villines, April 27 2009
-
Re: Forthcoming Book: The Art Of Community Craig Ragland, April 27 2009
- Re: Forthcoming Book: The Art Of Community Brian Bartholomew, April 27 2009
-
Re: Forthcoming Book: The Art Of Community Brian Bartholomew, April 27 2009
- Re: Forthcoming Book: The Art Of Community Fred H Olson, April 29 2009
Results generated by Tiger Technologies Web hosting using MHonArc.